E
Exofluke
Guest
Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread
How can you be serious? Agreed that some things have complications, but to suggest all things (that have been tested) are not proven to be true? I have to ignore that for now. >_>
It's a process for both testing and organizing. Without organization, the tests would fail. But dang... now you really got me.. "in science nothing is ever proven to be true"... *insert face palm*Science isn't process of organizing data, but the process for testing it. And in science nothing is ever proven to be true.
How can you be serious? Agreed that some things have complications, but to suggest all things (that have been tested) are not proven to be true? I have to ignore that for now. >_>
I think you just contradicted yourself with your claim about science.Yes, determinism could be proven to be true, assuming omniscience and a computer capable of simulating the entire universe(neither of which is possible within the universe)
Well, to make things more confusing... for the record, traveling back in time is a paradox in itself.As for Grandfather paradox(which is what I assume you're referring to), if determinism is true, the paradox can be solved very neatly: If you travel back in time, everything happens the way it already happened and no paradox is possible: you can't do anything that would cause paradox, because that would conflict with determinism.