[Studio FOW] Nightmare: Code Valentine

[kiko]

Not sure if anyone knows about this (Except fucking everyone), but it's out, and it's HOT.

From the makers of Kunoichi, and other stuff,

You must be registered to see the links

brings yet another (free) high quality 3D porn goodness.

You must be registered to see the links

(Has a shitload of seeders so it shouldn't be a problem downloading/streaming directly.)

Have fun ;3

 

[Awkweird_Dude]

Re: [Studio FOW] Nightmare: Code Valentine

No love for human zombie gangbangs...

 

[kiko]

Re: [Studio FOW] Nightmare: Code Valentine

No love for human zombie gangbangs...

Yeah, sadly. It's still really good though

 

[mayaktheunholy]

Re: [Studio FOW] Nightmare: Code Valentine

No love for human zombie gangbangs...

Yeah, sadly. It's still really good though

It seemed like they were teasing a zombie gangbang several times too.

I think it may have been because they already did one as a raffle a while back (March 2016). Probably thought it would have been redundant. I'm just speculating though.

Only complaint I had was the vanilla scene seemed really out of place. If they wanted to appeal to the vanilla crowd, that could have been a separate video altogether. Would likely have satisfied both sides a bit better.

 

[super_slicer]

Re: [Studio FOW] Nightmare: Code Valentine

IDK, with their smaller videos FOW does pretty good most of the time. But unless you're into gonzo stuff their larger works just fail to interest. I didn't even bother watching the kunoichi sequel.

 

[kiko]

Re: [Studio FOW] Nightmare: Code Valentine

IDK, with their smaller videos FOW does pretty good most of the time. But unless you're into gonzo stuff their larger works just fail to interest. I didn't even bother watching the kunoichi sequel.

Kunoichi 2 has only one scene that's decent, and it's at the end. Somehow the belly bulge fetish gets me, and they do tend to put the good stuff at the end

 

[Elarithon]

Re: [Studio FOW] Nightmare: Code Valentine

The ending to this one reminds me of how SCOURGE OF THE EVIL ended, and that reminds me that it's been over 3 years since those guys released anything new, which is sad.

It's been a while since there's been a FOW release which I liked. The only bad thing, imo, is that vanilla scene, but the good thing about it is that it's easily skippable.

 

[xXHaseoXx]

Re: [Studio FOW] Nightmare: Code Valentine

This video has split the fanbase in half. I am on the half that liked it BUT it could of been a lot better.

The lack of Zombie on Jill action is terrible and the scene with Chris was very "what the fuck were they thinking?"

The deal breaker than made me not love it was the lack of Ahegao. Jill should of enjoyed it at one point but it didn't happen.

8/10 from me.

 

[Awkweird_Dude]

Re: [Studio FOW] Nightmare: Code Valentine

8/10 is not a deal breaker score.

For me, the quality graphics and animation gives it a solid 6 already. 3 each for art and animation. Then plus 2 for the hell of it, which gives it the 8/10. The two remaining scores is 1 point for hitting at least 1 fetish, or 2 points for hitting multiple of your fetishes. -1 score for hitting an unwanted fetish, or -2 for hitting multiple fetishes that bug you. So, for me it's a 7/10.

I'm also talkin outta my ass, so don't take me seriously.

 

[super_slicer]

Re: [Studio FOW] Nightmare: Code Valentine

The deal breaker than made me not love it was the lack of Ahegao..

You disgust me. If there's one fetish I wish I could expunge it would be Ahegao.


Jesus, if you tell me there's no gang-bangs or asian style squeaking I might actually try watching this.


As for grading porn it works like this.

Can you fap to it? +10
Did you have to skip content? -5
Did you lose your boner if you didn't? -10
Did it have Ahegao, gang bangs or asian squeaking? -1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

 

[BlueShinobi]

Re: [Studio FOW] Nightmare: Code Valentine

It's on XHamster, if you don't care to download it in HD. Wasn't worth keeping(or watching) for me.

I suppose I'm the only one disappointed that they picked a version of Jill that's flatter chested than the game. And she's not exactly spilling out to start with.

Jill has a number of different looks. Sometimes she's cute, sometimes, she looks like a boy/man(Especially RE5).
I was hoping they'd use this one:

But they didn't. Studio FOW's Jill, just looks a boy to me. Which is often true in the game, but not always. Which is cool if you're into that look - I'm not. Wish they would have had something with Ada Wong, instead.

 

[mayaktheunholy]

Re: [Studio FOW] Nightmare: Code Valentine

Jesus, if you tell me there's no gang-bangs or asian style squeaking I might actually try watching this.

No gangbang in this one. They tease a zombie GB at least twice, but it doesn't happen. As for no ahegao, depends on what you consider ahegao, I would say it's mild and only in a brief part. And definitely no high pitched Asian squealing, VA sounds 100% American.

It's on XHamster, if you don't care to download it in HD. Wasn't worth keeping(or watching) for me.

I suppose I'm the only one disappointed that they picked a version of Jill that's flatter chested than the game. And she's not exactly spilling out to start with.

Jill has a number of different looks. Sometimes she's cute, sometimes, she looks like a boy/man(Especially RE5).

The model's body is usually custom made and not derived from the game at all. Often it's the in-game head stitched onto a custom body of some kind. Not sure how this one was made for certain though.

But I have to agree, wasn't worth keeping to me either. Though I'll admit it's mostly because I expected something else.

 

[ToxicShock]

Re: [Studio FOW] Nightmare: Code Valentine

The lack of Zombie on Jill action is terrible and the scene with Chris was very "what the fuck were they thinking?"

You must be registered to see the links

 

[Awkweird_Dude]

Re: [Studio FOW] Nightmare: Code Valentine

You disgust me. If there's one fetish I wish I could expunge it would be Ahegao.


Jesus, if you tell me there's no gang-bangs or asian style squeaking I might actually try watching this.


As for grading porn it works like this.

Can you fap to it? +10
Did you have to skip content? -5
Did you lose your boner if you didn't? -10
Did it have Ahegao, gang bangs or asian squeaking? -1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

Dude, that's brutal. By that scoring it'd be...

-999,999,999,999,999,999,995/10 for me

Edit:Nvm, it was actually 5/10 (I didn't lose my boner cause I skipped content)

 

[super_slicer]

Re: [Studio FOW] Nightmare: Code Valentine

VA sounds 100% American.

I've seen/heard white girls do it... just as bad.

I get ya though. I'll give it a look now.

 

[kiko]

Re: [Studio FOW] Nightmare: Code Valentine

You must be registered to see the links

This is just fucked up. It took them months to do this and they release it for free, yet people still bitch about it..

 

[mayaktheunholy]

Re: [Studio FOW] Nightmare: Code Valentine

This is just fucked up. It took them months to do this and they release it for free, yet people still bitch about it..

Yeah, some people would find a reason to bitch if you gave them a 100 dollar bill...

I mean, that scene did seem out of place, but it's nothing to get bent out of shape about. And yeah, people have no idea how much work goes into these things. I have some inkling since I've rigged models for them.

 

[ToxicShock]

Re: [Studio FOW] Nightmare: Code Valentine

No one should get death threats for shit like that

Scene did suck though, the fuck were they thinking

 

[super_slicer]

Re: [Studio FOW] Nightmare: Code Valentine

Probably were trying to placate all the people that bitch about gangbangs and tentacle scenes....

Didn't work though.

 

[mayaktheunholy]

Re: [Studio FOW] Nightmare: Code Valentine

Actually, most of the bitching I've seen is about the "rapey" aspect. They had a vanilla scene in Kunoichi 2, but it made a lot more sense.

I think a lot of it is just the mentality a lot of creators fall into at some point or other, the "kitchen sink" approach. Trying to satisfy everyone, but losing their focus in the process.