- Joined
- Nov 15, 2008
- Messages
- 7,746
- Reputation score
- 81
Re: Last Post Wins
Squirrels
Squirrels
There are a number of things I can't stand about squirrels, and I would just love to share them with you. For most of the facts I'm about to present, I have provided documentation and urge you to confirm these facts for yourself if you're skeptical. Squirrels is hooked on designer victimology but fails to notice the real victims: the entire next generation.
I act based on what I think is right, not who I think is right. That's why I try always to arraign squirrels at the tribunal of public opinion. It's also why I say that it claims that it can legitimate irresponsibility, laziness, and infidelity and get away with it. Whether that's true or not, its evidence is corrupted by a vast amount of nonsense and outright fraud. Before we can further discuss squirrels's claim we must acknowledge that we mustn't let squirrels slow scientific progress. That would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy.
Squirrels claims that the world is crying out to labor beneath its firm but benevolent heel. That claim illustrates a serious reasoning fallacy, one that is pandemic in its reinterpretations of historic events. Then again, most members of our quick-fix, sugar-rush, attention-deficit society are too impatient to realize the importance of commenting on squirrels's policies. I wish only that a few more people could see that if we let squirrels sow the seeds of separatism we'll be reaping the crop for quite a long time.
To be honest, squirrels not only lies but it brags about its lying to its pals. I strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can't say that I'm 100% true to this, but squirrels's frequent vacillating leads me to believe that in the Old Testament, the Book of Kings relates how the priests of Baal were slain for deceiving the people. I'm not suggesting that there be any contemporary parallel involving squirrels, but everything I've said so far is by way of introduction to the key point I want to make in this letter. My key point is that I, hardheaded cynic that I am, want to begin the debate about squirrels's mind games. I want to do this not because I need to tack another line onto my résumé but because if we let squirrels obfuscate the issue so that one can't see what ought to be thoroughly obvious to all, all we'll have to look forward to in the future is a public realm devoid of culture and a narrow and routinized professional life untouched by the highest creations of civilization.
The time is always right to do what is right. That's why we must indubitably chastise squirrels for not doing any research before spouting off. The first step in that process is to realize that I once had a nightmare in which it was free to oppress, segregate, and punish others. When I awoke, I realized that this nightmare was frighteningly close to reality. For instance, it is the case both in my nightmare and in reality that squirrels definitely dropped a clanger by admitting that it's unreasonable poltroons like it that fight with spiritual weapons that are as domineering as they are libidinous. I'll go further: It says that power, politics, and privilege should prevail over the rule of law. This is noxious falsehood. The truth is that I have in fact told it that it is no accident that what goes around comes around. Unfortunately, there really wasn't anything to its response. I suppose squirrels just doesn't want to admit that what really irks me is that it has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let it contravene decency or it'll give voice, in a totally emotional and non-rational way, to its deep-rooted love of fascism.
Although squirrels was likely following the dictates of its conscience when it decided to lead an active disinformation campaign, the fact remains that by comparing today to even ten years ago and projecting the course we're on, I'd say we're in for an even more supercilious, piteous, and illogical society, all thanks to squirrels's pronouncements. So what if squirrels hates me for pointing out that for all of its professed concern for human rights, squirrels has yet to take a firm and unambiguous stand against those saturnine televangelists who kill the goose bearing the golden egg? Let it hate me. I consider such hatred a mark of honor, a mark of distinction. We must encourage individuals to come out of their cocoons and flourish if we are ever to punish those who lie or connive at half-truths. Yes, this is a bold, audacious, even unprecedented undertaking. Yes, it lacks any realistic guarantee of success. However, it is an undertaking that we must surely pursue because it takes more than a mass of myopic schemers to help others to see through the empty and meaningless statements uttered by squirrels and its expositors. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to take vengeance on squirrels as being the fomenter of what is a universal plague throughout the civilized world.
Squirrels has stated that its jeremiads enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness. One clear inference from that statement—an inference that is never really disavowed—is that it is a tireless protector of civil rights and civil liberties for all people. Now that's just pouty. Squirrels contends that the rules don't apply to it. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from?
It's easy for us to shake our heads at squirrels's foolishness and cowardice. It's easy for us to exclaim that we should stop this insanity. It's easy for us to say, "Squirrels's harangues are a modern-day example of a Procrustean bed." The point is that it's easy for us to say these things because we need to look beyond the most immediate and visible problems with squirrels. We need to look at what is behind these problems and understand that squirrels aims at nothing less than the complete overthrow of capitalism, representational government, and democracy. Alas, I usually get a lot of blank stares from people when I say something like that. What I mean is that squirrels says that all it takes to start a rabbit farm is a magician's magic hat. Hey, squirrels, how about telling us the truth for once?
I call upon squirrels to stop its oppression, lies, immorality, and debauchery. I call upon it to be an organization of manners, principles, honour, and purity. And finally, I call upon it to forgo its desire to move increasingly towards the establishment of a totalitarian Earth. Efforts to prevent us from getting in touch with our feelings are not vestiges of a former era. They are the beginnings of a phenomenon which, if permitted to expand unchecked, will stand in the way of progress.
It would be great if all of us could institute change. In the end, however, money talks and you-know-what walks. Perhaps that truism also explains why if squirrels's orations were intended as a joke, squirrels forgot to include the punchline. As far back as I can remember, squirrels has pitted flibbertigibbets against buggers and deadbeats against bohemians. Squirrels likes to cite poll results that "prove" that it understands the difference between civilization and savagery. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of its pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that squirrels wants to get me thrown in jail. It can't cite a specific statute that I've violated, but it does believe that there must be some statute. This tells me that my love for people necessitates that I examine the warp and woof of squirrels's ruses. Yes, I face opposition from squirrels. However, this is not a reason to quit but to strive harder. Okay, I've written enough for one letter, so let me just finish by saying that I challenge squirrels to admit it was wrong and thereby begin the healing process.
I act based on what I think is right, not who I think is right. That's why I try always to arraign squirrels at the tribunal of public opinion. It's also why I say that it claims that it can legitimate irresponsibility, laziness, and infidelity and get away with it. Whether that's true or not, its evidence is corrupted by a vast amount of nonsense and outright fraud. Before we can further discuss squirrels's claim we must acknowledge that we mustn't let squirrels slow scientific progress. That would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy.
Squirrels claims that the world is crying out to labor beneath its firm but benevolent heel. That claim illustrates a serious reasoning fallacy, one that is pandemic in its reinterpretations of historic events. Then again, most members of our quick-fix, sugar-rush, attention-deficit society are too impatient to realize the importance of commenting on squirrels's policies. I wish only that a few more people could see that if we let squirrels sow the seeds of separatism we'll be reaping the crop for quite a long time.
To be honest, squirrels not only lies but it brags about its lying to its pals. I strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can't say that I'm 100% true to this, but squirrels's frequent vacillating leads me to believe that in the Old Testament, the Book of Kings relates how the priests of Baal were slain for deceiving the people. I'm not suggesting that there be any contemporary parallel involving squirrels, but everything I've said so far is by way of introduction to the key point I want to make in this letter. My key point is that I, hardheaded cynic that I am, want to begin the debate about squirrels's mind games. I want to do this not because I need to tack another line onto my résumé but because if we let squirrels obfuscate the issue so that one can't see what ought to be thoroughly obvious to all, all we'll have to look forward to in the future is a public realm devoid of culture and a narrow and routinized professional life untouched by the highest creations of civilization.
The time is always right to do what is right. That's why we must indubitably chastise squirrels for not doing any research before spouting off. The first step in that process is to realize that I once had a nightmare in which it was free to oppress, segregate, and punish others. When I awoke, I realized that this nightmare was frighteningly close to reality. For instance, it is the case both in my nightmare and in reality that squirrels definitely dropped a clanger by admitting that it's unreasonable poltroons like it that fight with spiritual weapons that are as domineering as they are libidinous. I'll go further: It says that power, politics, and privilege should prevail over the rule of law. This is noxious falsehood. The truth is that I have in fact told it that it is no accident that what goes around comes around. Unfortunately, there really wasn't anything to its response. I suppose squirrels just doesn't want to admit that what really irks me is that it has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let it contravene decency or it'll give voice, in a totally emotional and non-rational way, to its deep-rooted love of fascism.
Although squirrels was likely following the dictates of its conscience when it decided to lead an active disinformation campaign, the fact remains that by comparing today to even ten years ago and projecting the course we're on, I'd say we're in for an even more supercilious, piteous, and illogical society, all thanks to squirrels's pronouncements. So what if squirrels hates me for pointing out that for all of its professed concern for human rights, squirrels has yet to take a firm and unambiguous stand against those saturnine televangelists who kill the goose bearing the golden egg? Let it hate me. I consider such hatred a mark of honor, a mark of distinction. We must encourage individuals to come out of their cocoons and flourish if we are ever to punish those who lie or connive at half-truths. Yes, this is a bold, audacious, even unprecedented undertaking. Yes, it lacks any realistic guarantee of success. However, it is an undertaking that we must surely pursue because it takes more than a mass of myopic schemers to help others to see through the empty and meaningless statements uttered by squirrels and its expositors. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to take vengeance on squirrels as being the fomenter of what is a universal plague throughout the civilized world.
Squirrels has stated that its jeremiads enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness. One clear inference from that statement—an inference that is never really disavowed—is that it is a tireless protector of civil rights and civil liberties for all people. Now that's just pouty. Squirrels contends that the rules don't apply to it. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from?
It's easy for us to shake our heads at squirrels's foolishness and cowardice. It's easy for us to exclaim that we should stop this insanity. It's easy for us to say, "Squirrels's harangues are a modern-day example of a Procrustean bed." The point is that it's easy for us to say these things because we need to look beyond the most immediate and visible problems with squirrels. We need to look at what is behind these problems and understand that squirrels aims at nothing less than the complete overthrow of capitalism, representational government, and democracy. Alas, I usually get a lot of blank stares from people when I say something like that. What I mean is that squirrels says that all it takes to start a rabbit farm is a magician's magic hat. Hey, squirrels, how about telling us the truth for once?
I call upon squirrels to stop its oppression, lies, immorality, and debauchery. I call upon it to be an organization of manners, principles, honour, and purity. And finally, I call upon it to forgo its desire to move increasingly towards the establishment of a totalitarian Earth. Efforts to prevent us from getting in touch with our feelings are not vestiges of a former era. They are the beginnings of a phenomenon which, if permitted to expand unchecked, will stand in the way of progress.
It would be great if all of us could institute change. In the end, however, money talks and you-know-what walks. Perhaps that truism also explains why if squirrels's orations were intended as a joke, squirrels forgot to include the punchline. As far back as I can remember, squirrels has pitted flibbertigibbets against buggers and deadbeats against bohemians. Squirrels likes to cite poll results that "prove" that it understands the difference between civilization and savagery. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of its pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that squirrels wants to get me thrown in jail. It can't cite a specific statute that I've violated, but it does believe that there must be some statute. This tells me that my love for people necessitates that I examine the warp and woof of squirrels's ruses. Yes, I face opposition from squirrels. However, this is not a reason to quit but to strive harder. Okay, I've written enough for one letter, so let me just finish by saying that I challenge squirrels to admit it was wrong and thereby begin the healing process.
