What's new

A short rant about Line Marvel


Obeliskos

Tentacle God
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
4,093
Reputation score
274
It will truly surprise some people to hear me say this, but one of the most mind-numbing mysteries for those of us who don't like Mr. Line Marvel is trying to understand people who do. I would like to start by discussing Mr. Marvel's protests, mainly because they scare me. The thing I'm the most frightened about is that my love for people necessitates that I build a sane and healthy society free of Mr. Marvel's destructive influences. Yes, I face opposition from Mr. Marvel. However, this is not a reason to quit but to strive harder.

Mr. Marvel is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks. He claims that all literature that opposes moral relativism was forged by ignorant dirtbags. Perhaps he has some sound arguments on his side, but if so he's keeping them hidden. I'd say it's far more likely that Mr. Marvel recently stated that ethical responsibility is merely a trammel of earthbound mortals and should not be required of a demigod like him. He said that with a straight face, without even cracking a smile or suppressing a giggle. He said it as if he meant it. That's scary because one of his most loyal brethren is known to have remarked, "If Mr. Marvel kicks us in the teeth we'll then lick his toes and beg for another kick." And there you have it: a direct quote from a primary source. The significance of that quote is that as long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, Mr. Marvel's disciples don't really care that his coterie controls illegal drugs and prostitution as well as banking, oil, defense, and the media. Let me recap that for you because it really is extraordinarily important: I want to thank him for his shell games. They give me an excellent opportunity to illustrate just how self-serving Mr. Marvel can be.

Mr. Marvel claims that I'm too uncouth to point out the glaring contradiction between his idealized view of resistentialism and reality. I would say that that claim is 70% folderol, 20% twaddle, and 10% another illaudable attempt to push the State towards greater influence, self-preservation, and totalitarianism and away from civic engagement, constituent choice, and independent thought. I wonder what would happen if he really did dismantle national civil rights organizations by driving a wedge between the leaders and the rank-and-file members. There's a spooky thought. It seems to me that Mr. Marvel is both crass and testy. Now there's a dangerous combination if I've ever seen one.

You may have noticed that Mr. Marvel should pay a price for his lamebrained ramblings. But you don't know the half of it. For starters, I'm not in the habit of giving advice to Mr. Marvel's purblind jackals. However, there's always a first time: You guys should stop forcing me to react violently. I admit I don't have much confidence that they'll follow that advice, but it's important to make it known that Mr. Marvel claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly after getting caught trying to spit in the face of propriety. This claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by Mr. Marvel's patsies. The truth is that every so often, Mr. Marvel tries challenging all I stand for. Whenever he gets caught doing so he raises a terrific hullabaloo calculated to support those for whom hatred has become a way of life.

Mr. Marvel's worshippers argue that his way of life is correct and everyone else's isn't. These are the same viperine, iconoclastic barrators who scrawl pro-elitism graffiti over everything. This is no coincidence; Mr. Marvel wants to rub salt into our wounds. Who does he think he is? I mean, he has already been able to compose paeans to cynicism. What worries me more than that, however, is that if Mr. Marvel ever manages to embark on wholesale torture and slaughter of innocent civilians, that's when the defecation will really hit the air conditioning. The public is like a giant that Mr. Marvel has blindfolded, drugged, and gagged. This giant has plugs in his ears and Mr. Marvel leads him around by the nose. Clearly, such a giant needs to advocate concrete action and specific quantifiable goals. That's why I feel obligated to notify the giant (i.e., the public) that no one likes being attacked by the most wily malingerers you'll ever see. Even worse, Mr. Marvel exploits our fear of those attacks—which he claims will evolve one day into biological, chemical, or nuclear attacks—as a pretext to impact public policy for years to come. If you think that's scary, then you should remember that Mr. Marvel's childish "Mine! Mine! Mine! Now! Now! Now!" attitude makes me think that maybe when he repeated over and over the rumor that he can make all of our problems go away merely by sprinkling some sort of magic, pink, pixie dust over everything that he considers censorious or baleful, his accomplices, never too difficult to fool, swallowed it. No joke.

Mr. Marvel is a grungy vindictive-type. I use that label only when it's true. If you don't believe it is, then consider that either Mr. Marvel has no real conception of the sweep of history, or he is merely intent on winning some debating pin by trying to pierce a hole in my logic with "facts" that are taken out of context. We should note, of course, that what I've written about him doesn't prove anything in itself. It's only suggestive but it does make a good point that he is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, Mr. Marvel's willingness to achieve total world domination sets a new record for brazenness.

That reminds me: Mr. Marvel is a serial exaggerator. If I were to be less kind, I'd say he's a liar. Either way, if there's an untold story here, it's that I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "Mr. Marvel has always favored providing a privileged and protected status for nutty curmudgeons (especially the two-faced type)." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that once one begins thinking about free speech, about maladroit disinformation artists who use ostracism and public opinion to prevent the airing of views contrary to their own satanic beliefs, one realizes that Mr. Marvel truly believes that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. It is just such contumelious, conceited megalomania, stinking, anal-retentive egoism, and intellectual aberrancy that stirs Mr. Marvel to project a stream of shambolic images of death, sex, disaster, material goods, celebrities, and other fixtures in a mock-Olympian firmament.

Mr. Marvel undeniably believes that freedom must be abolished in order for people to be more secure and comfortable. Unfortunately for him, that's all in his imagination. Mr. Marvel needs to get out of that fictional world and get back to reality, where people can see that he has stated that everyone with a different set of beliefs from his is going to get a one-way ticket to Hell. One clear inference from that statement—an inference that is never really disavowed—is that genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all utterly justified. Now that's just nit-picky. It is similarly noteworthy that if he thinks that plagiarism brings one closer to nirvana, then he's sadly mistaken. To be honest, it may seem at first that Mr. Marvel has no sense of personal boundaries. When we descend to details, however, we see that he sells the supposed merits of officialism on the basis of rhetoric, not evidence. The evidence, however belated, is now in, and the evidence says that prudence is no vice. Cowardice—especially Mr. Marvel's hypocritical form of it—is.

It may be soothing and pleasant for Mr. Marvel to think that science is merely a tool invented by the current elite to maintain power, but he will probably respond to this letter just like he responds to all criticism. He will put me down as "sinful" or "cantankerous". That's his standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about him except the most fawning praise. He should learn to appreciate what he has instead of feeling so oppressed because he can't do everything he wants, every time he wants to. Oddly enough, imprudent lummoxes are receptive to Mr. Marvel's exploitative messages and fool easily. Stranger still, if Mr. Marvel continues to submerge us in a sea of simplism, crime will escalate as schools deteriorate, corruption increases, and quality of life plummets. He likes to seem smarter than he really is. It therefore always amuses me whenever Mr. Marvel cracks open a thesaurus, aims for intellectualism, misses, and lands squarely in a puddle of judgmental frippery.

If Mr. Marvel manages to pursue a surly agenda under the guise of false concern for the environment, poverty, civil rights, or whatever, our nation will not endure as a civilization, as a geopolitical entity, or even as a society. Rather, it will exist only as a prison, a prison in which crude, mingy cads force us to bow down low before diabolic hermits. There is no possible justification for the argument that the most obscene cutthroats I've ever seen should be given absolute authority to glorify rummy, suppressive, murderous governments as the ideologically correct alternative to all other possibilities, but that's a story for another time. For now, I want to focus on the way that I must admit that I've read only a small fraction of Mr. Marvel's writings. (As a well-known aphorism states, it is not necessary to eat all of an apple to learn that it is rotten.) Nevertheless, I've read enough of Mr. Marvel's writings to know that I have often maintained that reasonable people can reasonably disagree. Unfortunately, when dealing with Mr. Marvel and his shills, that claim assumes facts not in evidence. So let me claim instead that it is mathematically provable that when some scabrous lotharios first introduced me to Mr. Marvel's beer-guzzling fusillades, I felt that civilization had reached a nadir of bleakness. I'm not actually familiar with the proof for that statement and wouldn't understand it even if it were shown to me, but it seems very believable based upon my experience. What's also quite believable is that Mr. Marvel uses quislingism to smear people of impeccable character and reputation. That's the large elephant in the room that nobody talks about. Nevertheless, I, hardheaded cynic that I am, sincerely avouch that people really ought to start talking about it because then they'd realize that my sophistries are clearly in defense of decency and human dignity and violate nobody's rights. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and in many cases it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it surely expresses how Mr. Marvel's tactics have merged with priggism in several interesting ways. Both spring from the same kind of reality-denying mentality. Both glorify mealymouthed malefactors. And both encumber the religious idea with too many things of a purely earthly nature and thus bring religion into a totally unnecessary conflict with science. I'll finish this letter by instructing you not to blindly accept my words or those of others as truth. Investigate, discriminate, and question everything not proven. Only by doing so can you determine for yourself that Mr. Line Marvel should slither back under whatever rock he crawled out from.
 

Momiji

Lurker
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Messages
881
Reputation score
72
Re: A short rant about Line Marvel

It will truly surprise some people to hear me say this, but one of the most mind-numbing mysteries for those of us who don't like Mr. Line Marvel is trying to understand people who do. I would like to start by discussing Mr. Marvel's protests, mainly because they scare me. The thing I'm the most frightened about is that my love for people necessitates that I build a sane and healthy society free of Mr. Marvel's destructive influences. Yes, I face opposition from Mr. Marvel. However, this is not a reason to quit but to strive harder.

Mr. Marvel is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks. He claims that all literature that opposes moral relativism was forged by ignorant dirtbags. Perhaps he has some sound arguments on his side, but if so he's keeping them hidden. I'd say it's far more likely that Mr. Marvel recently stated that ethical responsibility is merely a trammel of earthbound mortals and should not be required of a demigod like him. He said that with a straight face, without even cracking a smile or suppressing a giggle. He said it as if he meant it. That's scary because one of his most loyal brethren is known to have remarked, "If Mr. Marvel kicks us in the teeth we'll then lick his toes and beg for another kick." And there you have it: a direct quote from a primary source. The significance of that quote is that as long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, Mr. Marvel's disciples don't really care that his coterie controls illegal drugs and prostitution as well as banking, oil, defense, and the media. Let me recap that for you because it really is extraordinarily important: I want to thank him for his shell games. They give me an excellent opportunity to illustrate just how self-serving Mr. Marvel can be.

Mr. Marvel claims that I'm too uncouth to point out the glaring contradiction between his idealized view of resistentialism and reality. I would say that that claim is 70% folderol, 20% twaddle, and 10% another illaudable attempt to push the State towards greater influence, self-preservation, and totalitarianism and away from civic engagement, constituent choice, and independent thought. I wonder what would happen if he really did dismantle national civil rights organizations by driving a wedge between the leaders and the rank-and-file members. There's a spooky thought. It seems to me that Mr. Marvel is both crass and testy. Now there's a dangerous combination if I've ever seen one.

You may have noticed that Mr. Marvel should pay a price for his lamebrained ramblings. But you don't know the half of it. For starters, I'm not in the habit of giving advice to Mr. Marvel's purblind jackals. However, there's always a first time: You guys should stop forcing me to react violently. I admit I don't have much confidence that they'll follow that advice, but it's important to make it known that Mr. Marvel claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly after getting caught trying to spit in the face of propriety. This claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by Mr. Marvel's patsies. The truth is that every so often, Mr. Marvel tries challenging all I stand for. Whenever he gets caught doing so he raises a terrific hullabaloo calculated to support those for whom hatred has become a way of life.

Mr. Marvel's worshippers argue that his way of life is correct and everyone else's isn't. These are the same viperine, iconoclastic barrators who scrawl pro-elitism graffiti over everything. This is no coincidence; Mr. Marvel wants to rub salt into our wounds. Who does he think he is? I mean, he has already been able to compose paeans to cynicism. What worries me more than that, however, is that if Mr. Marvel ever manages to embark on wholesale torture and slaughter of innocent civilians, that's when the defecation will really hit the air conditioning. The public is like a giant that Mr. Marvel has blindfolded, drugged, and gagged. This giant has plugs in his ears and Mr. Marvel leads him around by the nose. Clearly, such a giant needs to advocate concrete action and specific quantifiable goals. That's why I feel obligated to notify the giant (i.e., the public) that no one likes being attacked by the most wily malingerers you'll ever see. Even worse, Mr. Marvel exploits our fear of those attacks—which he claims will evolve one day into biological, chemical, or nuclear attacks—as a pretext to impact public policy for years to come. If you think that's scary, then you should remember that Mr. Marvel's childish "Mine! Mine! Mine! Now! Now! Now!" attitude makes me think that maybe when he repeated over and over the rumor that he can make all of our problems go away merely by sprinkling some sort of magic, pink, pixie dust over everything that he considers censorious or baleful, his accomplices, never too difficult to fool, swallowed it. No joke.

Mr. Marvel is a grungy vindictive-type. I use that label only when it's true. If you don't believe it is, then consider that either Mr. Marvel has no real conception of the sweep of history, or he is merely intent on winning some debating pin by trying to pierce a hole in my logic with "facts" that are taken out of context. We should note, of course, that what I've written about him doesn't prove anything in itself. It's only suggestive but it does make a good point that he is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, Mr. Marvel's willingness to achieve total world domination sets a new record for brazenness.

That reminds me: Mr. Marvel is a serial exaggerator. If I were to be less kind, I'd say he's a liar. Either way, if there's an untold story here, it's that I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "Mr. Marvel has always favored providing a privileged and protected status for nutty curmudgeons (especially the two-faced type)." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that once one begins thinking about free speech, about maladroit disinformation artists who use ostracism and public opinion to prevent the airing of views contrary to their own satanic beliefs, one realizes that Mr. Marvel truly believes that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. It is just such contumelious, conceited megalomania, stinking, anal-retentive egoism, and intellectual aberrancy that stirs Mr. Marvel to project a stream of shambolic images of death, sex, disaster, material goods, celebrities, and other fixtures in a mock-Olympian firmament.

Mr. Marvel undeniably believes that freedom must be abolished in order for people to be more secure and comfortable. Unfortunately for him, that's all in his imagination. Mr. Marvel needs to get out of that fictional world and get back to reality, where people can see that he has stated that everyone with a different set of beliefs from his is going to get a one-way ticket to Hell. One clear inference from that statement—an inference that is never really disavowed—is that genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all utterly justified. Now that's just nit-picky. It is similarly noteworthy that if he thinks that plagiarism brings one closer to nirvana, then he's sadly mistaken. To be honest, it may seem at first that Mr. Marvel has no sense of personal boundaries. When we descend to details, however, we see that he sells the supposed merits of officialism on the basis of rhetoric, not evidence. The evidence, however belated, is now in, and the evidence says that prudence is no vice. Cowardice—especially Mr. Marvel's hypocritical form of it—is.

It may be soothing and pleasant for Mr. Marvel to think that science is merely a tool invented by the current elite to maintain power, but he will probably respond to this letter just like he responds to all criticism. He will put me down as "sinful" or "cantankerous". That's his standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about him except the most fawning praise. He should learn to appreciate what he has instead of feeling so oppressed because he can't do everything he wants, every time he wants to. Oddly enough, imprudent lummoxes are receptive to Mr. Marvel's exploitative messages and fool easily. Stranger still, if Mr. Marvel continues to submerge us in a sea of simplism, crime will escalate as schools deteriorate, corruption increases, and quality of life plummets. He likes to seem smarter than he really is. It therefore always amuses me whenever Mr. Marvel cracks open a thesaurus, aims for intellectualism, misses, and lands squarely in a puddle of judgmental frippery.

If Mr. Marvel manages to pursue a surly agenda under the guise of false concern for the environment, poverty, civil rights, or whatever, our nation will not endure as a civilization, as a geopolitical entity, or even as a society. Rather, it will exist only as a prison, a prison in which crude, mingy cads force us to bow down low before diabolic hermits. There is no possible justification for the argument that the most obscene cutthroats I've ever seen should be given absolute authority to glorify rummy, suppressive, murderous governments as the ideologically correct alternative to all other possibilities, but that's a story for another time. For now, I want to focus on the way that I must admit that I've read only a small fraction of Mr. Marvel's writings. (As a well-known aphorism states, it is not necessary to eat all of an apple to learn that it is rotten.) Nevertheless, I've read enough of Mr. Marvel's writings to know that I have often maintained that reasonable people can reasonably disagree. Unfortunately, when dealing with Mr. Marvel and his shills, that claim assumes facts not in evidence. So let me claim instead that it is mathematically provable that when some scabrous lotharios first introduced me to Mr. Marvel's beer-guzzling fusillades, I felt that civilization had reached a nadir of bleakness. I'm not actually familiar with the proof for that statement and wouldn't understand it even if it were shown to me, but it seems very believable based upon my experience. What's also quite believable is that Mr. Marvel uses quislingism to smear people of impeccable character and reputation. That's the large elephant in the room that nobody talks about. Nevertheless, I, hardheaded cynic that I am, sincerely avouch that people really ought to start talking about it because then they'd realize that my sophistries are clearly in defense of decency and human dignity and violate nobody's rights. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and in many cases it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it surely expresses how Mr. Marvel's tactics have merged with priggism in several interesting ways. Both spring from the same kind of reality-denying mentality. Both glorify mealymouthed malefactors. And both encumber the religious idea with too many things of a purely earthly nature and thus bring religion into a totally unnecessary conflict with science. I'll finish this letter by instructing you not to blindly accept my words or those of others as truth. Investigate, discriminate, and question everything not proven. Only by doing so can you determine for yourself that Mr. Line Marvel should slither back under whatever rock he crawled out from.
lol wall of text
 

Pheonix Alugere

New member
Former Moderator
Joined
Nov 15, 2008
Messages
7,746
Reputation score
81
Re: A short rant about Line Marvel

Can I get that in 10 words or less?
 

DarkFire1004

Tentacle Goddess of the H-Section
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
4,897
Reputation score
1,783
Re: A short rant about Line Marvel

Sorry what? I couldn't read any of it on account of your lack of Times New Roman.
 

Nunu

Despot
Former Admin
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Messages
3,806
Reputation score
312
Re: A short rant about Line Marvel

so what you're saying in a nutshell is that line marvel caused 9/11?
 

Momiji

Lurker
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Messages
881
Reputation score
72
Re: A short rant about Line Marvel

It will truly surprise some people to hear me say this, but one of the most mind-numbing mysteries for those of us who don't like Mr. Line Marvel is trying to understand people who do. I would like to start by discussing Mr. Marvel's protests, mainly because they scare me. The thing I'm the most frightened about is that my love for people necessitates that I build a sane and healthy society free of Mr. Marvel's destructive influences. Yes, I face opposition from Mr. Marvel. However, this is not a reason to quit but to strive harder.

Mr. Marvel is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks. He claims that all literature that opposes moral relativism was forged by ignorant dirtbags. Perhaps he has some sound arguments on his side, but if so he's keeping them hidden. I'd say it's far more likely that Mr. Marvel recently stated that ethical responsibility is merely a trammel of earthbound mortals and should not be required of a demigod like him. He said that with a straight face, without even cracking a smile or suppressing a giggle. He said it as if he meant it. That's scary because one of his most loyal brethren is known to have remarked, "If Mr. Marvel kicks us in the teeth we'll then lick his toes and beg for another kick." And there you have it: a direct quote from a primary source. The significance of that quote is that as long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, Mr. Marvel's disciples don't really care that his coterie controls illegal drugs and prostitution as well as banking, oil, defense, and the media. Let me recap that for you because it really is extraordinarily important: I want to thank him for his shell games. They give me an excellent opportunity to illustrate just how self-serving Mr. Marvel can be.

Mr. Marvel claims that I'm too uncouth to point out the glaring contradiction between his idealized view of resistentialism and reality. I would say that that claim is 70% folderol, 20% twaddle, and 10% another illaudable attempt to push the State towards greater influence, self-preservation, and totalitarianism and away from civic engagement, constituent choice, and independent thought. I wonder what would happen if he really did dismantle national civil rights organizations by driving a wedge between the leaders and the rank-and-file members. There's a spooky thought. It seems to me that Mr. Marvel is both crass and testy. Now there's a dangerous combination if I've ever seen one.

You may have noticed that Mr. Marvel should pay a price for his lamebrained ramblings. But you don't know the half of it. For starters, I'm not in the habit of giving advice to Mr. Marvel's purblind jackals. However, there's always a first time: You guys should stop forcing me to react violently. I admit I don't have much confidence that they'll follow that advice, but it's important to make it known that Mr. Marvel claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly after getting caught trying to spit in the face of propriety. This claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by Mr. Marvel's patsies. The truth is that every so often, Mr. Marvel tries challenging all I stand for. Whenever he gets caught doing so he raises a terrific hullabaloo calculated to support those for whom hatred has become a way of life.

Mr. Marvel's worshippers argue that his way of life is correct and everyone else's isn't. These are the same viperine, iconoclastic barrators who scrawl pro-elitism graffiti over everything. This is no coincidence; Mr. Marvel wants to rub salt into our wounds. Who does he think he is? I mean, he has already been able to compose paeans to cynicism. What worries me more than that, however, is that if Mr. Marvel ever manages to embark on wholesale torture and slaughter of innocent civilians, that's when the defecation will really hit the air conditioning. The public is like a giant that Mr. Marvel has blindfolded, drugged, and gagged. This giant has plugs in his ears and Mr. Marvel leads him around by the nose. Clearly, such a giant needs to advocate concrete action and specific quantifiable goals. That's why I feel obligated to notify the giant (i.e., the public) that no one likes being attacked by the most wily malingerers you'll ever see. Even worse, Mr. Marvel exploits our fear of those attacks—which he claims will evolve one day into biological, chemical, or nuclear attacks—as a pretext to impact public policy for years to come. If you think that's scary, then you should remember that Mr. Marvel's childish "Mine! Mine! Mine! Now! Now! Now!" attitude makes me think that maybe when he repeated over and over the rumor that he can make all of our problems go away merely by sprinkling some sort of magic, pink, pixie dust over everything that he considers censorious or baleful, his accomplices, never too difficult to fool, swallowed it. No joke.

Mr. Marvel is a grungy vindictive-type. I use that label only when it's true. If you don't believe it is, then consider that either Mr. Marvel has no real conception of the sweep of history, or he is merely intent on winning some debating pin by trying to pierce a hole in my logic with "facts" that are taken out of context. We should note, of course, that what I've written about him doesn't prove anything in itself. It's only suggestive but it does make a good point that he is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, Mr. Marvel's willingness to achieve total world domination sets a new record for brazenness.

That reminds me: Mr. Marvel is a serial exaggerator. If I were to be less kind, I'd say he's a liar. Either way, if there's an untold story here, it's that I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "Mr. Marvel has always favored providing a privileged and protected status for nutty curmudgeons (especially the two-faced type)." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that once one begins thinking about free speech, about maladroit disinformation artists who use ostracism and public opinion to prevent the airing of views contrary to their own satanic beliefs, one realizes that Mr. Marvel truly believes that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. It is just such contumelious, conceited megalomania, stinking, anal-retentive egoism, and intellectual aberrancy that stirs Mr. Marvel to project a stream of shambolic images of death, sex, disaster, material goods, celebrities, and other fixtures in a mock-Olympian firmament.

Mr. Marvel undeniably believes that freedom must be abolished in order for people to be more secure and comfortable. Unfortunately for him, that's all in his imagination. Mr. Marvel needs to get out of that fictional world and get back to reality, where people can see that he has stated that everyone with a different set of beliefs from his is going to get a one-way ticket to Hell. One clear inference from that statement—an inference that is never really disavowed—is that genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all utterly justified. Now that's just nit-picky. It is similarly noteworthy that if he thinks that plagiarism brings one closer to nirvana, then he's sadly mistaken. To be honest, it may seem at first that Mr. Marvel has no sense of personal boundaries. When we descend to details, however, we see that he sells the supposed merits of officialism on the basis of rhetoric, not evidence. The evidence, however belated, is now in, and the evidence says that prudence is no vice. Cowardice—especially Mr. Marvel's hypocritical form of it—is.

It may be soothing and pleasant for Mr. Marvel to think that science is merely a tool invented by the current elite to maintain power, but he will probably respond to this letter just like he responds to all criticism. He will put me down as "sinful" or "cantankerous". That's his standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about him except the most fawning praise. He should learn to appreciate what he has instead of feeling so oppressed because he can't do everything he wants, every time he wants to. Oddly enough, imprudent lummoxes are receptive to Mr. Marvel's exploitative messages and fool easily. Stranger still, if Mr. Marvel continues to submerge us in a sea of simplism, crime will escalate as schools deteriorate, corruption increases, and quality of life plummets. He likes to seem smarter than he really is. It therefore always amuses me whenever Mr. Marvel cracks open a thesaurus, aims for intellectualism, misses, and lands squarely in a puddle of judgmental frippery.

If Mr. Marvel manages to pursue a surly agenda under the guise of false concern for the environment, poverty, civil rights, or whatever, our nation will not endure as a civilization, as a geopolitical entity, or even as a society. Rather, it will exist only as a prison, a prison in which crude, mingy cads force us to bow down low before diabolic hermits. There is no possible justification for the argument that the most obscene cutthroats I've ever seen should be given absolute authority to glorify rummy, suppressive, murderous governments as the ideologically correct alternative to all other possibilities, but that's a story for another time. For now, I want to focus on the way that I must admit that I've read only a small fraction of Mr. Marvel's writings. (As a well-known aphorism states, it is not necessary to eat all of an apple to learn that it is rotten.) Nevertheless, I've read enough of Mr. Marvel's writings to know that I have often maintained that reasonable people can reasonably disagree. Unfortunately, when dealing with Mr. Marvel and his shills, that claim assumes facts not in evidence. So let me claim instead that it is mathematically provable that when some scabrous lotharios first introduced me to Mr. Marvel's beer-guzzling fusillades, I felt that civilization had reached a nadir of bleakness. I'm not actually familiar with the proof for that statement and wouldn't understand it even if it were shown to me, but it seems very believable based upon my experience. What's also quite believable is that Mr. Marvel uses quislingism to smear people of impeccable character and reputation. That's the large elephant in the room that nobody talks about. Nevertheless, I, hardheaded cynic that I am, sincerely avouch that people really ought to start talking about it because then they'd realize that my sophistries are clearly in defense of decency and human dignity and violate nobody's rights. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and in many cases it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it surely expresses how Mr. Marvel's tactics have merged with priggism in several interesting ways. Both spring from the same kind of reality-denying mentality. Both glorify mealymouthed malefactors. And both encumber the religious idea with too many things of a purely earthly nature and thus bring religion into a totally unnecessary conflict with science. I'll finish this letter by instructing you not to blindly accept my words or those of others as truth. Investigate, discriminate, and question everything not proven. Only by doing so can you determine for yourself that Mr. Line Marvel should slither back under whatever rock he crawled out from.
In this letter I intend to express my views about Mr. Obeliskos with gentleness and respect. Permit me this forum to rant. On the issue of solipsism, he is wrong again. Sure, Obeliskos is every bit as insane as illogical nobodies (especially the prissy type). But he does, occasionally, make a valid point. But when he says that his subliminal psywar campaigns are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos, that's where the facts end and the ludicrousness begins.

Obeliskos respects nothing, honors nothing, and values nothing beyond himself. Am I aware of how Obeliskos will react when he reads that last sentence? Yes. Do I care? No, because he's trying to get us to acquiesce to a Faustian bargain. In the short term this bargain may help us communicate and teach. Unfortunately, in the long term it will enable Obeliskos to promote a culture of dependency and failure.

Wherever you look, you'll see Obeliskos enforcing intolerance in the name of tolerance. You'll see him suppressing freedom in the name of freedom. And you'll see him crushing diversity of opinion in the name of diversity. Perhaps he received his information (or rather, misinformation) from late-night television programs and "B" movies. Should someone think that I am saying too much, I am not saying too much but much too little. For he is the grand master of obfuscation and misdirection. And let me tell you, he's the type of person who will trump up any lie for the occasion, and the more of a thumper it is, the better Obeliskos likes it. His forces are too lazy to build a true community of spirit and purpose based on mutual respect and caring. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that I have some advice for Obeliskos. He should keep his mouth shut until he stops being such a whiney, horny carouser and starts being at least one of informative, agreeable, creative, or entertaining.

Obeliskos does not want to scrap the notion of national sovereignty because he is crotchety, debauched, bestial, and passive-aggressive (though, granted, Obeliskos is all of the aforementioned) but rather because Obeliskos combines greed and blood lust into a single persona. Hence and therefore, I recently checked out one of his recent tracts. Oh, look; Obeliskos is again saying that trees cause more pollution than automobiles do. Raise your hand if you're surprised. Seriously, though, Obeliskos is too quasi-mingy to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that it's possible that he doesn't realize this because he has been ingrained with so much of lexiphanicism's propaganda. If that's the case, I recommend that we expose false prophets who preach that he can walk on water.

If Obeliskos manages to interfere with my efforts to test the assumptions that underlie his remarks, civilization will crumble almost immediately. Investigators from a future era will need to sift through the charred wreckage of our society looking for the black box to figure out what happened. Maybe they'll even discover that I'm at loggerheads with Obeliskos on at least one important issue. Namely, he argues that he answers to no one. I take the opposite position, that Obeliskos's arguments are evil. They're evil because they cause global warming; they make your teeth fall out; they give you spots; they incite nuclear war. And, as if that weren't enough, one of the drossy misfits in Obeliskos's employ has penned an extensive treatise whose thesis is that Obeliskos would never even consider giving rise to lawless parvenus. Contrary to what that embarrassingly emollient hagiography asserts, Obeliskos maintains a "Big Brother" dossier of personal information about everyone he distrusts, to use as a potential career-ruining weapon. Is your name listed in that dossier? Here's the answer, albeit in a somewhat circuitous and roundabout style: Obeliskos has for a long time been arguing that courtesy and manners don't count for anything. Had he instead been arguing that it is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt, I might cede him his point. As it stands, the leap of faith required to bridge the logical gap in Obeliskos's arguments is simply too terrifying for me to contemplate. What I do often contemplate, however, is how he gets a lot of perks from the system. True to form, Obeliskos ceaselessly moves the goalposts to prevent others from benefiting from the same perks. This suggests that he refers to a variety of things using the word "counterestablishment". Translating this bit of jargon into English isn't easy. Basically, Obeliskos is saying that we can trust him not to shrink the so-called marketplace of ideas down to convenience-store size, which we all know is patently absurd. At any rate, some people apparently believe that if we don't bother him, he won't bother us. The fallacy of that belief is that our desires and his are not merely different; they are opposed in mortal enmity. Obeliskos wants to take credit for others' accomplishments. We, in contrast, want to alert people that his cankered projects arouse inter-ethnic suspicion. Obeliskos then blames us for that. Now there's a prizewinning example of psychological projection if I've ever seen one.

Sometimes it seems deranged bullies are like a farmer who, in the spring, would work the ground, plant seeds, fertilize, and cultivate the ground for a period of time. And then, perhaps, he decides to go off to Hawaii and have a good time and forget the reason he planted the crop in the first place. Well, a farmer wouldn't do that. But Obeliskos would demand that Earth submit to the dominion of pathological, insensate ivory-tower academics if he got the chance. It has been proven time and time again that it is immature and stupid of him to progressively narrow the sphere of human freedom. It would be mature and intelligent, however, to drag him in front of a tribunal and try him for his crimes against humanity, and that's why I say that society must soon decide either to reveal some shocking facts about his hijinks or else to let Obeliskos stir up trouble. The decision is one of life or death, peaceful existence or perpetual social fever. I can hope only that those in charge realize that Obeliskos's primary goal is to condone universal oppression. All of his other objectives are secondary to this one supreme purpose. That's why you must always remember that Obeliskos is a hard worker. He works hard to prevent anyone from commenting on his scummy grievances. This is of course most illuminating, but what if we wish to engage rather in eristic search for truth, or in heuristic debate, or perhaps in paromologetic illation? In my experience, when I was younger I wanted to get people to see through the hollowness, the sham, the silliness of Obeliskos's homicidal tracts. I still want to do that, but now I realize that conclaves of his hangers-on have all the dissent found in a North Korean communist party meeting. That's why no one there will ever admit that Obeliskos makes it sound like black is white and night is day. That's the rankest sort of pretense I've ever heard. The reality is that we must do something about the continuing—make that the escalating—effort on Obeliskos's part to feed us a fanciful load of horse manure as unassailable truth. This call to action begins with you. You must be the first to study the problem and recommend corrective action. You must be the one to increase awareness and understanding of our similarities and differences. And you must inform your fellow man that in any decent society, Obeliskos would be just another anti-democratic, improvident sandbagger standing on a streetcorner braying his nonsensical diatribes from atop a soapbox. Nevertheless, he has managed to gain some credibility among unstable, brusque clods because they relate to her message that it is not only acceptable but indeed desirable to extend his fifteen minutes of fame to fifteen months.

We mustn't let Obeliskos cultivate the purest breed of irresponsibility. That would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy. We ought to rake him over the coals for insulting my intelligence. That'll make Obeliskos think once—I would have said "twice" but I don't see any indication that he has previously given any thought to the matter—before trying to force us to do things or take stands against our will.

I'll tell you what we need to do about all the craziness Obeliskos is mongering. We need to provide an atmosphere of mutual respect, free from sectarianism, wowserism, and all other forms of prejudice and intolerance. He has no fixed ethical principles. Likewise, he has a knack for convincing bloodthirsty, evil lowlifes that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of inerudite stereotypes. That's called marketing. The underlying trick is to use sesquipedalian terms like "pathologicopsychological" and "unextinguishableness" to keep his sales pitch from sounding tyrannical. That's why you really have to look hard to see that Obeliskos plans to worsen an already unstable situation. The result will be an amalgam of yawping scapegoatism and silly philistinism, if such a monster can be imagined.

There's a lot of daylight between Obeliskos's views and mine. He believes that he acts in the public interest while I think that I have no set opinion as to whether or not one of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is anti-intellectualism. I do, however, clearly claim that the slimy freaks that comprise Obeliskos's retinue are as thick as thieves. If one of them is willing to cover up his criminal ineptitude, then they all are. What's more, none of them is able to accept that I have observed that those who disagree with me on the next point tend to be unsophisticated and those who recognize the validity of the point to be more educated. The point is that we must stand as a witness in the divine court of the Eternal Judge and proclaim that Obeliskos should not be allowed to operate heavy machinery, specifically, his ego. If we fail then all of our sacrifices and all of the dreams and sacrifices of our ancestors will have been in vain. The key is to realize that Obeliskos uses racialism to besmirch the memory of some genuine historic figures. That's the large elephant in the room that nobody talks about. Nevertheless, I profess that people really ought to start talking about it because then they'd realize that Obeliskos is reluctant to resolve problems. He always just looks the other way and hopes no one will notice that he says he's going to make it nearly impossible to disturb his insecure gravy train eventually. Is he out of his money-grubbing mind? The answer is fairly obvious when you consider that if one accepts the framework I've laid out here, it follows that his conclusions are built on lies and they depend on make-believe for their continuation.

This may be a foregone conclusion, but if we foreground the cognitive and emotional palette of Obeliskos's prurient witticisms rather than their pathology we can enter vitally into his world. Why do we want to do that? Because my only wonder is, Does Obeliskos enjoy the dubious cachet of being the world's most directionless skiver? I mean, Obeliskos will stop at nothing to inject his lethal poison into our children's minds and souls. This may sound outrageous but if it were fiction I would have thought of something more credible. As it stands, libertinism is dangerous. Obeliskos's besotted version of it is doubly so. The moral of the story: Mr. Obeliskos leads me to believe that he is wicked.
 

Mirchie

The user previously known as Hero-in-the-Dark
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Messages
1,342
Reputation score
57
Re: A short rant about Line Marvel

A short rant about Line Marvel?

Fuck. I don't wanna see your long one. My brain hurts now.
 

Pheonix Alugere

New member
Former Moderator
Joined
Nov 15, 2008
Messages
7,746
Reputation score
81
Re: A short rant about Line Marvel

There has to be some program that spits out those rants after given a name.
 

DarkFire1004

Tentacle Goddess of the H-Section
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
4,897
Reputation score
1,783
Re: A short rant about Line Marvel

Know Obe and Mo they probably DID write this though. Five bucks says every beginning letter in every sentence spells out an insult or something.
 
OP
Obeliskos

Obeliskos

Tentacle God
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
4,093
Reputation score
274
Re: A short rant about Line Marvel

Wow. What the hell? I spent 3 hours writing this fucking thing and nobody reads it. Then you accuse me of using some program?

I'd type up a rant about you, but I'm afraid you say a bot wrote that too.
 
R

Ryka

Guest
Re: A short rant about Line Marvel

I think a firend of mine also used this template to troll another forum. What application did you use?

Seriously, it even uses the exact saome wordings. I have read it. It would be a good laugh if I 'ranted' about someone and saw my 'rant post' myself. Though I'm not foolish enough to post it.
 
R

Ryka

Guest
Re: A short rant about Line Marvel

I will break from what I said just a bit, so I can show what he has done.
EDIT: Nevermine Momiji beat me to it. I will instead link the tool I found.

 
Last edited:

Momiji

Lurker
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Messages
881
Reputation score
72
Re: A short rant about Line Marvel

Hehehe, this whole thing with you guys is amusingly lame.
Oh shit, I'm insulted. Quick, man the hatches, I've never seen this amount of pure hatred and witty insults before. I think I'm suffocating under the weight of all that insult.
 

Mamono Assault Force

Coon Tamer
RP Moderator
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
19,403
Reputation score
442
Re: A short rant about Line Marvel

That's odd, because it wasn't an insult.

Are you on the pills again?
 

Pheonix Alugere

New member
Former Moderator
Joined
Nov 15, 2008
Messages
7,746
Reputation score
81
Re: A short rant about Line Marvel

It's more amusing when you choose an innocent animal for those rants, though:

There are a number of things I can't stand about squirrels, and I would just love to share them with you. For most of the facts I'm about to present, I have provided documentation and urge you to confirm these facts for yourself if you're skeptical. Squirrels is hooked on designer victimology but fails to notice the real victims: the entire next generation.

I act based on what I think is right, not who I think is right. That's why I try always to arraign squirrels at the tribunal of public opinion. It's also why I say that it claims that it can legitimate irresponsibility, laziness, and infidelity and get away with it. Whether that's true or not, its evidence is corrupted by a vast amount of nonsense and outright fraud. Before we can further discuss squirrels's claim we must acknowledge that we mustn't let squirrels slow scientific progress. That would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy.

Squirrels claims that the world is crying out to labor beneath its firm but benevolent heel. That claim illustrates a serious reasoning fallacy, one that is pandemic in its reinterpretations of historic events. Then again, most members of our quick-fix, sugar-rush, attention-deficit society are too impatient to realize the importance of commenting on squirrels's policies. I wish only that a few more people could see that if we let squirrels sow the seeds of separatism we'll be reaping the crop for quite a long time.

To be honest, squirrels not only lies but it brags about its lying to its pals. I strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can't say that I'm 100% true to this, but squirrels's frequent vacillating leads me to believe that in the Old Testament, the Book of Kings relates how the priests of Baal were slain for deceiving the people. I'm not suggesting that there be any contemporary parallel involving squirrels, but everything I've said so far is by way of introduction to the key point I want to make in this letter. My key point is that I, hardheaded cynic that I am, want to begin the debate about squirrels's mind games. I want to do this not because I need to tack another line onto my résumé but because if we let squirrels obfuscate the issue so that one can't see what ought to be thoroughly obvious to all, all we'll have to look forward to in the future is a public realm devoid of culture and a narrow and routinized professional life untouched by the highest creations of civilization.

The time is always right to do what is right. That's why we must indubitably chastise squirrels for not doing any research before spouting off. The first step in that process is to realize that I once had a nightmare in which it was free to oppress, segregate, and punish others. When I awoke, I realized that this nightmare was frighteningly close to reality. For instance, it is the case both in my nightmare and in reality that squirrels definitely dropped a clanger by admitting that it's unreasonable poltroons like it that fight with spiritual weapons that are as domineering as they are libidinous. I'll go further: It says that power, politics, and privilege should prevail over the rule of law. This is noxious falsehood. The truth is that I have in fact told it that it is no accident that what goes around comes around. Unfortunately, there really wasn't anything to its response. I suppose squirrels just doesn't want to admit that what really irks me is that it has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let it contravene decency or it'll give voice, in a totally emotional and non-rational way, to its deep-rooted love of fascism.

Although squirrels was likely following the dictates of its conscience when it decided to lead an active disinformation campaign, the fact remains that by comparing today to even ten years ago and projecting the course we're on, I'd say we're in for an even more supercilious, piteous, and illogical society, all thanks to squirrels's pronouncements. So what if squirrels hates me for pointing out that for all of its professed concern for human rights, squirrels has yet to take a firm and unambiguous stand against those saturnine televangelists who kill the goose bearing the golden egg? Let it hate me. I consider such hatred a mark of honor, a mark of distinction. We must encourage individuals to come out of their cocoons and flourish if we are ever to punish those who lie or connive at half-truths. Yes, this is a bold, audacious, even unprecedented undertaking. Yes, it lacks any realistic guarantee of success. However, it is an undertaking that we must surely pursue because it takes more than a mass of myopic schemers to help others to see through the empty and meaningless statements uttered by squirrels and its expositors. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to take vengeance on squirrels as being the fomenter of what is a universal plague throughout the civilized world.

Squirrels has stated that its jeremiads enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness. One clear inference from that statement—an inference that is never really disavowed—is that it is a tireless protector of civil rights and civil liberties for all people. Now that's just pouty. Squirrels contends that the rules don't apply to it. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from?

It's easy for us to shake our heads at squirrels's foolishness and cowardice. It's easy for us to exclaim that we should stop this insanity. It's easy for us to say, "Squirrels's harangues are a modern-day example of a Procrustean bed." The point is that it's easy for us to say these things because we need to look beyond the most immediate and visible problems with squirrels. We need to look at what is behind these problems and understand that squirrels aims at nothing less than the complete overthrow of capitalism, representational government, and democracy. Alas, I usually get a lot of blank stares from people when I say something like that. What I mean is that squirrels says that all it takes to start a rabbit farm is a magician's magic hat. Hey, squirrels, how about telling us the truth for once?

I call upon squirrels to stop its oppression, lies, immorality, and debauchery. I call upon it to be an organization of manners, principles, honour, and purity. And finally, I call upon it to forgo its desire to move increasingly towards the establishment of a totalitarian Earth. Efforts to prevent us from getting in touch with our feelings are not vestiges of a former era. They are the beginnings of a phenomenon which, if permitted to expand unchecked, will stand in the way of progress.

It would be great if all of us could institute change. In the end, however, money talks and you-know-what walks. Perhaps that truism also explains why if squirrels's orations were intended as a joke, squirrels forgot to include the punchline. As far back as I can remember, squirrels has pitted flibbertigibbets against buggers and deadbeats against bohemians. Squirrels likes to cite poll results that "prove" that it understands the difference between civilization and savagery. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of its pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that squirrels wants to get me thrown in jail. It can't cite a specific statute that I've violated, but it does believe that there must be some statute. This tells me that my love for people necessitates that I examine the warp and woof of squirrels's ruses. Yes, I face opposition from squirrels. However, this is not a reason to quit but to strive harder. Okay, I've written enough for one letter, so let me just finish by saying that I challenge squirrels to admit it was wrong and thereby begin the healing process.
 

Lucas

Lurker
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
1,304
Reputation score
88
Re: A short rant about Line Marvel

GRABBIN' PILLS GRABBIN PEELZ GRABBIN' PEEHOLEZ
 

garfield751

Lurker
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
832
Reputation score
11
Re: A short rant about Line Marvel

why is everybody still posting in here?
 
Top