E
Exofluke
Guest
Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread
It's a process for both testing and organizing. Without organization, the tests would fail. But dang... now you really got me.. "in science nothing is ever proven to be true"... *insert face palm*
How can you be serious? Agreed that some things have complications, but to suggest all things (that have been tested) are not proven to be true? I have to ignore that for now. >_>
I think you just contradicted yourself with your claim about science.
Well, to make things more confusing... for the record, traveling back in time is a paradox in itself.
Science isn't process of organizing data, but the process for testing it. And in science nothing is ever proven to be true.
It's a process for both testing and organizing. Without organization, the tests would fail. But dang... now you really got me.. "in science nothing is ever proven to be true"... *insert face palm*
How can you be serious? Agreed that some things have complications, but to suggest all things (that have been tested) are not proven to be true? I have to ignore that for now. >_>
Yes, determinism could be proven to be true, assuming omniscience and a computer capable of simulating the entire universe(neither of which is possible within the universe)
I think you just contradicted yourself with your claim about science.
As for Grandfather paradox(which is what I assume you're referring to), if determinism is true, the paradox can be solved very neatly: If you travel back in time, everything happens the way it already happened and no paradox is possible: you can't do anything that would cause paradox, because that would conflict with determinism.
Well, to make things more confusing... for the record, traveling back in time is a paradox in itself.