What's new

Games Discussion Thread


noman

Lurker
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
2,070
Reputation score
417
Re: Games Discussion Thread

I personally just find the thing with the thanix cannons to be a good example of my main problems with this game. The lore states one thing clearly, several times, but the people who create the lore and the people who create the game are too far removed so you get things like this. It is stated that thanix cannons are mounted on most ships now, yet we are show that they're not.

I wish they had the same writer as ME1 & ME2, maybe then it would've made sense.
Well, whenever you have massive stories like the ME universe, all kind of contradictions pop up everywhere. The inconsistencies in ME is nothing compared to Warhammer 40K. Just try asking people about the squa..... *user terminated*
 

Hentaispider

Lord of the Tap Dance \oO.Oo/ (And Reputation Mana
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
11,998
Reputation score
430
Re: Games Discussion Thread

Well, whenever you have massive stories like the ME universe, all kind of contradictions pop up everywhere. The inconsistencies in ME is nothing compared to Warhammer 40K. Just try asking people about the squa..... *user terminated*
Mass effect spans three games, all presumably written by the same team. WH40k has decades of fluff written by a large number of different people who occasionally may have been working together.
 

Unnatural Kiwi

Sex Demon
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
290
Reputation score
41
Re: Games Discussion Thread



The amount of time people put into making their emblems on Armored Core: 5 is amazing. Making drawing style quality art in-game, that's dedication I can admire.
 

Shrike7

Lurker
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
7,437
Reputation score
102
Re: Games Discussion Thread

yeah, i gathered that from the comment right after mine, unfortunately. Still, it seems pretty removed from the discussion that was actually going on. Leaving it alone now, seems pretty well picked over anyways.
 

noman

Lurker
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
2,070
Reputation score
417
Re: Games Discussion Thread

I love AC, but I'm pretty badly irked at the focus on online in 5. If I had a PS3 it wouldn't be an issue, mind you. I just balk at the idea of paying for XBL.
That's actually a very good question. Why on earth do we need to pay for online gaming on a console? The price tag for console games is already 3 or 4 times that of a PC game.
 

super_slicer

Lord High Inquisitor
Staff member
H-Section Moderator
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Messages
12,556
Reputation score
30,669
Re: Games Discussion Thread

Supposedly to maintain server costs, microsoft doesn't directly get any money when you purchase a game for the 360 (they still get a bunch from the companies involved in making the game though). And since you have to connect to microsoft's live servers to connect to games that use dedicated servers, or to the other people playing the game in the case of P2P based multiplayer it does make sense.

Though that's only in the scope of the machine's abilities, which microsoft put in place exactly for these reasons.

On another note, I've been playing games other than ME3, they just took a while to finish due to the amount of time I do spend on the multi.

First up is Radiant Historia. I really liked this game, however I ended up taking about a month long break from it because of ME3's and kingdoms of amalur (fuck SP) releases.

Combat is a mix of traditional RPG/tactical/combo and it works quite well, focusing on getting as many enemies in the same square and hitting them with something hard to take them all out, quite enjoyable unless you have party members without specific enemy-moving attacks but you'll be able to work around that usually. One thing I didn't like about the gameplay was that unless you strike an enemy with your sword (stunning them, though it only has a chance of working each strike) before they touch you the encounter is going to suck, with each party member's turns broken up and often the enemy going first and destroying you. So I ended up using a cheat to make them always stunned which made the combat much more enjoyable.

Sometimes it becomes a difficult to figure out what you're supposed to do to continue the main quest, or a sidequest. This is easily remedied by finding a guide, unfortunately it's that or spending a large chunk of time figuring it out for yourself .

The story is quite long and well done. There are some parts that just don't make sense, but they're easily handwaved by the fantasy setting for me. Character development could have been a bit more emphasized, but that didn't really hurt the story. One thing that bugged me as I was playing was the constant points where someone doesn't want to tell you something and the main char says "It's ok" well it isn't but it ends up being neccessary to set up the ending twist which I didn't guess straight off the bat so + points for that.

I'd say Radiant Historia is a solid 8/10 with a little help from a guide and the cheat I mentioned. Though without those it only loses about a point making it a 7/10 if I hadn't had access to the aforementioned things.


Next up is the stinking turd known as Lunar Dragon song. This game should have never even hit the shelves, and to be honest I couldn't even stomach playing this for more than 5 hours.

You're forced to choose wheter you get crappy items to sell (for very little money) or experince from fights, enemies level with you so you can't become overpowered but if you don't level you'll definately become underpowered. Some enemies can steal the items you gain to sell, while others can break the god-awfull expensive equipment you spent hours grinding to get in one hit. The story is almost non-existent, to the point of you have no idea why you're going someplace, you just go there. Oh and did I mention that you're pretty much on auto-pilot for combat? Even worse than ff13, you can choose to let the game do everything for you (all it does is attack untill you or the enemies are dead), or you can pick manual where you can choose between attack, use item, or use skill. Oh and on top of that, when you choose attack you can't pick what enemy you're going to attack so your main attacker is going to constantly be hitting the lowest priority target (and often the one with the lowest HP) wasting all that attack power and your weak shit mage will be hitting another instead of focusing on low hp targets.

There are some things about this game that aren't horrendous, most overland maps look quite nice, and characters are drawn quite well, there's a feature that lets you choose what building you go to in towns, which is neccessary only because there's no way to tell what building you're going into on the map untill you're on top of it unless you really want to waste your time memorizing the towns in the game.

Lastly I don't usually mention sound but god damn, there were several points in dungeons where the game would put on this high-pitched sound that just didn't fucking stop. This pile of shit gets a firm 0/10, don't play this game if you like RPGs, don't play this game if you're a fan of Lunar, just don't play this game.
 
Last edited:

Sinfulwolf

H-Section Moderator
H-Section Moderator
Joined
Nov 28, 2008
Messages
6,983
Reputation score
434
Re: Games Discussion Thread

That's actually a very good question. Why on earth do we need to pay for online gaming on a console? The price tag for console games is already 3 or 4 times that of a PC game.
No it's not. It's like ten bucks more... and even then only if you get the game on steam. Purchasing it from a store is the exact same price. Especially for all those big budget titles.

Witcher 2 was 59.99 when it came out
Skyrim is still 59.99.
Max Payne 3 is 59.99
MW3 is still 59.99

And those are the steam prices.

Edit: Those are the Steam prices in Canada, and I'm guessing the U.S. isn't far off.
 
Last edited:

Nunu

Despot
Former Admin
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Messages
3,806
Reputation score
312
Re: Games Discussion Thread

its near double those for australia. just because.
 

super_slicer

Lord High Inquisitor
Staff member
H-Section Moderator
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Messages
12,556
Reputation score
30,669
Re: Games Discussion Thread

You still need to use the XBL network to find those people is what I mean in the case of P2P, they designed the console to have no ability to access any other network in a meaningful way.

This is the unfortunate downside to the migration from PC gaming. Now that so many people play games on a console as opposed to their PCs the console manufacturers know they have us by the balls and are starting to squeeze.

TBH if it weren't for the multiplayer extending the life of games so greatly, I would have modded my 360 long ago. But as it stands I get more than my money's worth out of a snigle multiplayer title even with the $60 for the game and the $50 for XBL.

Also, figured out how to get all the weapons in the ME3 SP using gibbeds save editor, even the N7, preorder, PC exclusive, and the resurgence DLC ones. If anyone would like some help just send me a PM and I'll get you going.
 

Wonderboy

Lurker
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
1,397
Reputation score
146
Re: Games Discussion Thread

Seeing as I got an android phone prematurely for my birthday, I was wondering if anyone here would be interested in a little game of Wordfeud, it seems like fun, but I imagine it's better played with someone you know.

My username is "Who I need to be"
 
OP
Rule 34

Rule 34

Lurker
RP Moderator
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
3,877
Reputation score
192
Re: Games Discussion Thread

Well, I went and finished my ME3 Insanity playthrough... though I don't think the two medals were worth suffering through the ending again. The hardest part, in my opinion?

The boss fight against Kai Leng in the Cerberus base, if only because it doesn't create save spots between enemy waves. The first couple of times I didn't even get out of the starting gate before Leng finished me off. Running right into him helps, however, as it started a QTE that created some much needed distance. The Black Widow is the best choice for an Insanity playthrough. Headshot, pop out of zoom, immediately aim again for another headshot. If you don't mind its weight, you could use the Saber as a back up weapon. Alternatively, use a shotgun or the Talon.
 
Last edited:

super_slicer

Lord High Inquisitor
Staff member
H-Section Moderator
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Messages
12,556
Reputation score
30,669
Re: Games Discussion Thread

I'm going through as a sentinal, thought of doing adept but they're too squishy, and I've been just using my biotic explosions to destroy everything effortlessly, with the occasional overload to strip shields. Easiest max difficulty ever, with the exception of geth hunters.

Also, was wondering if anyone had played the sequel to FF13? The only reviews on gamefaqs look like they are from fanboys or the woefully foolish people that liked LIKED 13's battle system.
 
Last edited:

Newbie

Lurker
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Messages
1,789
Reputation score
180
Re: Games Discussion Thread

ME3 Multiplayer Speed Run:
4 level 20 Vanguards (2 Human, 1 Asari, 1 Krogan)
Difficulty: Silver
Enemy: Cerberus
Firebase Reactor (I think? The one with the red light in the central chamber.)
Full Extraction, time to complete: 11:30

That's pretty goddamn cool.
 

noman

Lurker
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
2,070
Reputation score
417
Re: Games Discussion Thread

ME3 Multiplayer Speed Run:
4 level 20 Vanguards (2 Human, 1 Asari, 1 Krogan)
Difficulty: Silver
Enemy: Cerberus
Firebase Reactor (I think? The one with the red light in the central chamber.)
Full Extraction, time to complete: 11:30

That's pretty goddamn cool.
Now try gold.

I can one man army silver with a level 20 human vanguard. I got owned on Gold. The power attacks just don't do nearly enough damage to gold enemies. You actually have to start shooting with heavy weapons, and that's the one thing that vanguards are not very good at.
 
OP
Rule 34

Rule 34

Lurker
RP Moderator
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
3,877
Reputation score
192
Re: Games Discussion Thread

I would never in my life would want to fight gold reapers. I already hate Banshees with a passion, I don't need them as early as wave 3.
 

super_slicer

Lord High Inquisitor
Staff member
H-Section Moderator
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Messages
12,556
Reputation score
30,669
Re: Games Discussion Thread

4 asari adepts (not those useless justicars) = easy wins on anything except a match on condor
 

lurker

Hentai Master
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Messages
5,002
Reputation score
202
Re: Games Discussion Thread

 

super_slicer

Lord High Inquisitor
Staff member
H-Section Moderator
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Messages
12,556
Reputation score
30,669
Re: Games Discussion Thread

Lol, I just lost the last bit of interest in paying for Diablo 3. Found out that it was online only (yeah, I'm usually late to the bus), so blizzard can go fuck themselves. Don't believe for an instant that online only will make this game un-pirateable, a server emulator will be needed sure, but that won't take very long to get out (few months at worst).

Honestly I shouldn't care, but I've been waiting for 10 FUCKING YEARS to play another diablo game. After I've played this I won't be giving a damn about any more titles from this company.
 
OP
Rule 34

Rule 34

Lurker
RP Moderator
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
3,877
Reputation score
192
Re: Games Discussion Thread

Checked out the demo for D3. It's not really what I'm looking for in a hack 'n slash, to be honest. It's a little too simplistic. I like fuckhuge skilltrees, and this doesn't deliver.
Edit: To say nothing of the always-online bullshit. That's usually a deal-breaker for me.
You could like Titan Quest then. It certainly has fuckhuge skill trees.
 
Top