Ozimandias
Demon Girl Master
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2015
- Messages
- 161
- Reputation score
- 14
Re: (3D Lotus) Skunk 4.1 #1 サイロスの灯台
We have an understanding difference here
In IT/Computing (my profession) the term "downgrade" has a specific meaning. It means to reduce performance, specifications, costs, features, options, performance and so on. In other words technical rather than visually pleasing.
What you are talking about is more the artistic side of things, and personal taste (totally valid considerations IMO). The operative words I would use here would be "better" or "worse", as they probably have no direct technical impact. Sorry, I am a techie, so I think like one.
@Anon_Ymous:
Two new posts, basically saying it should be available on DMM and DLsite 30th April. I can't wait.
Well, I want something to get my hands on and play with.
I know this guy is pretty unconventional with his project management style, and plays his cards close to his chest, but I wonder where the time testing, bug fixing and optimising was put in.
Or do we take him at face value: "get yourself a $1,000 computer and you can play this game"
Right now, this particular jury is most certainly "out"
Cheers,
OZ
Downgrade means it looks worse than before =)
especially their faces
We have an understanding difference here
In IT/Computing (my profession) the term "downgrade" has a specific meaning. It means to reduce performance, specifications, costs, features, options, performance and so on. In other words technical rather than visually pleasing.
What you are talking about is more the artistic side of things, and personal taste (totally valid considerations IMO). The operative words I would use here would be "better" or "worse", as they probably have no direct technical impact. Sorry, I am a techie, so I think like one.
@Anon_Ymous:
Two new posts, basically saying it should be available on DMM and DLsite 30th April. I can't wait.
Well, I want something to get my hands on and play with.
I know this guy is pretty unconventional with his project management style, and plays his cards close to his chest, but I wonder where the time testing, bug fixing and optimising was put in.
Or do we take him at face value: "get yourself a $1,000 computer and you can play this game"
Right now, this particular jury is most certainly "out"
Cheers,
OZ