UN to ban yer hentai

[Turrican]

These false-moralists, pain in the a**, with serious problems of mental illness. DO NOT KNOW that if this shit were to pass (the part that forbids art), it would cause a biblical propulsion chaos!
Because it would cripple, not only US ARTISTS, but also the entire populace will be shrouded in this!
In addition to many paintings, statues, books, etc ... even if they are a thousand years old, they will be wrongly indicted and destroyed!
But the article 19 of human rights (expression and crativity), what happened to it, I KICK IT IN THE A**?

 

[NLL]

Wonder if something like End of Evangelion will become illegal if this passes?

 

[autizboyz]

The problem on anime/hentai in general, there are no border line on the age department. Lot of anime that have "legal" loli and such. Take an example of

You must be registered to see the links

(her age 500+) or

You must be registered to see the links

(more realistic), i know we're talking about fictional character, by the law they both are "legal", but her apperance make her not "legal". I'm not on their side nor on the lolicon side, but i still don't get why a child figure can and will make you aroused. Cute and adorable ofcourse no doubt about that if we're talking about anime, but not aroused atleast for me, do i want to hug them? Ofcourse loli in anime are just too adorable, but do i want to sleep with them? Probably not but if she's legal then that's another story. This is the problem, there are too many extreme lolicon out there that turn into a pedophile, they are just scare that this will become a big issue, hell let's just look the worst case scenario you are married, and you seen your little daugther out from bath naked, and you got a boner because of it. Isn't that pretty messed up? Again i am not on their side, but i get it why they want to do that. My country already ban any kind of porn ages ago, and as anime/hentai viewer my self doesn't affect me at all. I kinda understand how h game dev or an artist feel, god bless and best of luck to them. Before you bash my head againts the wall repeatedly please be gentle.

 

[NLL]

The ol' "500 year old loli" excuse isn't a viable defense anymore. Dunno if it ever was. If it looks underage, it's underage. I don't give a shit, jerk off to whatever drawings you want. But who decides what looks underage and what doesn't?

Man, this shit's got me anxious. Sad all the time boys, help

 

[XSI]

When was the last time the UN stopped child marriages, or advocated against stronger responses against pedo rings?
It's pretty clear that they dont really care about kids, or they would have taken a whole lot more action against things that matter

 

[fidless]

The ol' "500 year old loli" excuse isn't a viable defense anymore. Dunno if it ever was. If it looks underage, it's underage. I don't give a shit, jerk off to whatever drawings you want. But who decides what looks underage and what doesn't?

Man, this shit's got me anxious. Sad all the time boys, help

Hopefully, it won't be like some bigger sites judging female age by her breast size automatically tagging the characters under age just because breasts are A, B size.

 

[Turrican]

ALERT: on September 26 we will see if the UN has really removed the part that forbids the animes and cartoons, or they have taken the piss out of us:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173748909065289730

Let's start praying.

 

[XSI]

Nothing we can really do until we see it
But that said the UN is a joke anyway so any sane country will just ignore them if they call for bullshit

 

[Turrican]

They have already posted the protocol, but unfortunately it is confusing and makes no sense.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173976102496133120

Let me explain Protasia has mentioned that the part about art and fiction has remorse or watered down, but unfortunately, the part remains that they are illegal.
And like article 13 of the copyright directive "you don't have to monitor but you are directly responsible".

We lost a battle but not war!

Many fans are furious with the UN, and Protasia along with other day October 4 will talk to a big shot of the UN to be precise to David Kaye, he is commissioner of freedom of expression and creativity.
The same person who has harshly criticized the copyright directive.

If they can convince, its influence will remove the damaging parts of the protocol.

It is one of the greatest possibilities to stick it where this rubbish at the UN does not beat the sun.
All is not lost!

NOTES: This is not binding as the directives or regulations or laws, but it is a finger in the ass the same, because false-moralists can use as an excuse to attract anyone or something inconvenient for them.

And let's remember that the UN wanted to ban religion (although protests are still on their agenda).

 

[kiko]

Section V. excerpt

63. The Committee is deeply concerned about the large amount of online and offline material, including drawings and virtual representations, depicting non-existing children or persons appearing to be children involved in sexually explicit conduct, and about the serious effect that such material can have on children’s right to dignity and protection. The Committee encourages States parties to include in their legal provisions regarding child sexual abuse material (child pornography) representations of non-existing children or of persons appearing to be children, in particular when such representations are used as part of a process to sexually exploit children.

Yeah these people are completely bonkers lol. Child exploitation is a real issue, but I never saw art hurt anyone, including the children. Also how in the fuck would a child be able to see this, unless their parents are complete morons? Damn

In today's age, every social media app has parental controls.

There's messenger for kids (Version of facebook messenger for children)
For pixiv, registration is required to see nsfw content
For twitter, according to their TOU, children cannot have a twitter profile
Tumblr has purged all porn (Well, most of it)
Facebook bans you if you post a sexually suggestive image on a public profile
Youtube strikes pornographic content pretty efficiently

So how on god's earth would a child stumble upon porn that would scar them deeply? If they do, that's the parent's fault for not providing protection.

 

[Turrican]

Section V. excerpt



Yeah these people are completely bonkers lol. Child exploitation is a real issue, but I never saw art hurt anyone, including the children. Also how in the fuck would a child be able to see this, unless their parents are complete morons? Damn

In today's age, every social media app has parental controls.

There's messenger for kids (Version of facebook messenger for children)
For pixiv, registration is required to see nsfw content
For twitter, according to their TOU, children cannot have a twitter profile
Tumblr has purged all porn (Well, most of it)
Facebook bans you if you post a sexually suggestive image on a public profile
Youtube strikes pornographic content pretty efficiently

So how on god's earth would a child stumble upon porn that would scar them deeply? If they do, that's the parent's fault for not providing protection.

My opinion because they did it:
$$$$$$$$$$ Is something missing? Oh yes! $$$.

 

[Turrican]

Ready for WAR!

You must be registered to see the links

 

[super_slicer]

Didn't I tell you to stop double-posting already?

 

[Turrican]

Didn't I tell you to stop double-posting already?

I know and I apologize, but this was set by Protasia a couple of hours after my last comment, next time if there will be news I'll change the last post, so we avoid non-voluntary inconsistencies.
I set it up because it was my duty to know if they are making a counter-attack.

Update 09-20-2019:
The CEO of the Protasia Foundation will speak with one of the UN, to be prescribed, the commissioner (or editor), for the freedom of expression and creativity David Kayne, the same who has harshly criticized the copyright directive.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174836069789044741

The date is October 4th in South Korea.

 

[noman]

UN guidelines are not enforceable anyway. Other than eradication of small pox, when was the last time the UN actually had a major effect on the world?

 

[Turrican]

UN guidelines are not enforceable anyway. Other than eradication of small pox, when was the last time the UN actually had a major effect on the world?

It is true that the UN cannot say what and how we must make laws.
But it is not right that they only say untruth, that THEY are the most molesters, already Japan has responded (not so well), and they reject this shit, and they accuse of not having respected the opinions of the Nations and of the population that protested.

You must be registered to see the links

And I know that almost all the states of the world WILL NEVER, (except UK, Australia and Canada), WHY? Esample:

-Sweden, they made a law more or less, but not even 1 year a year removed, because the abuses have increased.
-France, same thing and they took it off in 2015.
-Unlikely Italy, because this shit with only the Anime will hit, but everything, literature, statues, paintings etc ..., otherwise:
Ciao Ciao Dante Alighieri
Addio Boccaccio
Arrivederci per sempre Fontana di Trevi (Trevi Fountain).

I do not understand you English how you endure this injustice!

 

[XSI]

The thing to understand there is that the western governments do not represent the western people
That's why we have protests and actions to tell them to stop, but they don't care and they will do what they want. Not what the people want
It's also why people are not really protesting much- It doesn't really work for most of us since the government won't listen anyway

This is why there's things like the US invading places despite the US population being largely against it, mass immigration into European nations despite the people of those nations being opposed to it, and laws restricting just about anything all throughout the west. The people never wanted it, but the governments do so they ignore the people

 

[noman]

The thing to understand there is that the western governments do not represent the western people
That's why we have protests and actions to tell them to stop, but they don't care and they will do what they want. Not what the people want
It's also why people are not really protesting much- It doesn't really work for most of us since the government won't listen anyway

This is why there's things like the US invading places despite the US population being largely against it, mass immigration into European nations despite the people of those nations being opposed to it, and laws restricting just about anything all throughout the west. The people never wanted it, but the governments do so they ignore the people

Devil's advocate: sometimes people don't want what's actually best for them because the masses are easily swayed by false information, and often short sighted. There needs to be a balance between populist policy and what's good for the long terms..

 

[XSI]

As much as that is true, the people making the decisions make them for themselves, not for the people. Specifically short term policy to maximize corporate profits
Those wars and immigrants both benefit only the wealthy classes, who happen to be friends of and directly funding the politicians. They are indirectly funding the weaponry manufacturers and subsidizing labour for larger corporations as the examples. And so nearly all western policy can be distilled down to "What is best for the rich?" rather than "What is best for the people?"

 

[Turrican]

YES! There is still hope!

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181573213345783815

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1182297999441104896

And to top it off ...

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181612030027030529

Ah ... music to my ears!