Kinky.she's a near naked dogbold with a giant sword
First one not quite my thing though I can see an amazonian charm. Second one..Gets even kinkier when she's painting herself with the blood of her enemies and then she starts stripping cause she got hot and bothered by raging
Xarkana was your idea for a group without a leader? She is probably the worst possible leader you could have in this campaign. As a matter of fact, Kiera is not a leader in any way. A critic, to be sure, but she's far too neutral to things to care about anything other than making sure whatever they do is done efficiently because, to her, surviving without damage is the most important thing (especially now that they further understand the consequences of what happens when they get hurt) and is only speaking up because I think she'd refuse the group being led by someone who is pretty much evil and bloodthirsty.*chuckles* I can understand why the group struggles with cohesion, its not that there isn't a cohesive goal or a lack of a leader, infact theres more than one person with a leadership personality. Having none is bad for rp as no one guides along, but having .. I count four is an issue too, as all try to nudge the rp into a certain course of action, failing that struggle for dominance. Not unusual in big groups, but if none back down it is usually the wisest to split them up, if possible.
The fact of the matter is that any approach would work. Weiss', Xarkanas, Kats or Kieras, as the beauty of D&D is that a skilled DM can adjust the adventure to Good, Evil, Hackey Slashy or stealthy respectively, but the issue is that I've so far observed all of the leaders clashing, One pushes for diplomacy, one for preemptive strikes, one for direct confrontation and one for cautious approaches and all tug on the edges knotting the campaign together. It'd be best to reduce this to two leader types at best if none back down, for example, Weiss and Kat, with Weiss doing the talkies and Kat jumping in when it fails.
I can easily replace Xarkana with a less straight forwards leader type, I did pick her primarly because I though there would be a group cohesion problem for a lack of a leader, (though also because she as LE can easily stress-test a group), but unless something gives, focusing not exacerbating numbers would be the best sollution.
Because...?Xarkana was your idea for a group without a leader? She is probably the worst possible leader you could have in this campaign.
Yes. She is evil. That precludes her from leadership because? Your character refusing it speaks for her refusing to be lead, not for Xarkana making for a bad leader.I think she'd refuse the group being led by someone who is pretty much evil and bloodthirsty.
She's a bloodthirsty sociopath/psychopath (not sure which is more applicable, not a psychologist) who's self-centered and engages in acts of cruelty for amusement? Not a leader material for a group of people that are supposed to save and protect. And several PC's are on the good side.Because...?
Yes, she is, I still don't see how it disqualifies her from being a leader. Yes the group has good characters, but frankly, when you agreed to use poison I was quite sure that none of you were the strict and stingy type of good. Heres a simple example: Who says the hostages don't eat the same food that has been poisoned?She's a bloodthirsty sociopath/psychopath (not sure which is more applicable, not a psychologist) who's self-centered and engages in acts of cruelty for amusement? Not a leader material for a group of people that are supposed to save and protect. And several PC's are on the good side.
Where did you see the part about the other entrance? If there is one then breaking it would make sense, but I didn't see anything about that.From what I gathered, there was another entrance, and currently the noise is coming from within the cavern. So if we jam the portcullis they will have to destroy the gate instead of lifting it.