We're not going to do that because doing stupid shit goes hand-in-hand with being a junkie.
Spoken from someone who knows jack and shit about junkies. I've known a few in my lifetime (and more than I would be willing to interact with). Depending on the poison, they can range from hyperactive af (but still functional) to neurotic beyond coherence. It depends on how deep they've gone and how functional they are under the influence. If we are to assume that this story is true, then we're measuring Hunter as really fucking capable under the influence, ergo leaving evidence that can compromise you is not within the realm of possibility.
Are you a crackhead? If not then your personal experiences aren't relevant.
Because my experience with junkies, regardless of how involved I personally was, wouldn't work to push your narrative of "they Biden's are evil!" It would surely be a case of humility for you to at once admit you could be wrong.
It did contain pedo-shit and the timeline doesn't go back 3 or more years where are you getting your info?
I generally don't pay attention to the gas-lighting asshats at FOX. If there was an actual story worth telling, it'd be mainstream and my facebook feeds would be exploding with it. Hell, reddit and 4chan would have been making that shit front-page news. Absolute silence, bud.
When I said "at a distance" which you seem to have ignored I should have specified that it's in excess of 10ft. Oh, btw did you know that you can actually adjust the size of the text displayed by a computer if you have trouble reading it?
You must be registered to see the links
, even when soldering small things on a circuit board there are magnifying glasses that can help
You must be registered to see the links
. You're reaching here, give it up.
Certainly, certainly. What's your point? He can use tools to assist him with his work. We're going to ignore that, though, as we're ignoring my experience with junkies because, y'know, you're not the guy in question. Your experience is irrelevant. Doesn't matter what articles or studies or whichever you bring up. According to you, second- or third-party perspectives are wholly irrelevant to this disagreement.
Basically, you don't get to dictate what does and doesn't count. My experience counts, or we disregard what tools are available to the "legally blind" and your experience, as well. I can do the "ignorant jackass" bit as well as you. The difference is, I have to pretend.
Oh so they're burning down cities in riots over fictitious privilege? As far as my side, the right are just the lesser of two evils at the moment, once the cancer of identity politics has been burnt out I'll go right back to hating them equally as both sides are corrupt globalists. And taking a jab at the left isn't really whataboutism given that you're finding it unbelievable that the president elect has citizens that support him, I know it's probably hard for you to understand but in order to be elected president people have to support and vote for you.
Where did I say I find it unbelievable that there are people who support either Biden or Trump? I can accept that people support Trump. It's not unlikely. I find it incredibly doubtful that he has the kind of support that would substantiate any claims of voter fraud, though. Until I see evidence of such, I'm erring on the side of Trump speaking out of his ass. Kind of like you, right now.
They're burning down cities because there are real issues in the US that have gone on for far too long, that affect more people than you believe. Just because you haven't been outside in years, doesn't mean there aren't issues. It just means you're too terrified of fresh air to actually go out and witness some of the shit these people are "burning down cities" over. Hell, I don't even need to tell you to go outside and witness it, cause there is a multitude of videos on the net of this shit. You gonna cry "fake news," bud? Pretend the victims are just lying? Gonna call Sandy Hook a hoax again, Alex?
Oh a heavily left biased fact check, guess you got me there. Jesus, you might as well source an NYTimes or Wasington Post article. But you know what? Let's say he's the biggest liar in history, still doesn't discredit evidence.
"Heavily-biased" because it doesn't fit your narrative. Here, have some more sauce:
You must be registered to see the links
You must be registered to see the links
You must be registered to see the links
You must be registered to see the links
It's amazing how far the man has allegedly fallen from grace. It also highly discredits the narrative, when the man who presents this "evidence" can no longer be trusted by the general public to tell the truth. There's a story about this, too. It's a diddy called "the boy who cried wolf." You may want to look it up, take it to heart. May tell you something about how the world actually works.
Shit happens, it doesn't even have to take malicious intent for them to think there's not enough credibility at first glance, lose a memo about this under a stack of case-work, or just not have enough time to follow up on it immediately ( it does take quite a bit of time to fail at impeaching a president with intelligence you've fabricated after all ).
You have zero fucking clue how bureaucracy works, bud. I've had to deal with government workers. They are meticulous about keeping copies for important stuff like evidence, reports, etc. Heck, they make copies for the copies of their copies
just to making fucking sure they can't lose sight of something. it's a real pain in the ass, but you make fewer mistakes in the long-term. You're now trying to claim a government-run law-enforcement agency forgot basic procedure? C'mon, man!
When speaking about a computer and specifically the data on it ghosting is slang for making a copy of it. You really should look into the situation yourself before arguing about it ya know? I will spell it out clearly though: The FBI served him with a subpoena duces tecum, took the original pieces of evidence and pertaining documents into custody however, rather prudently, he had made a copy.
You must be registered to see the links
Nothing about computers. In colloquial terms, it means to "cut all communications with someone." In other words, you're full of shit and now, we have further evidence.
You must be registered to see the links
Specifically, it means you create a "soft copy" without going through the process of installation. It's generally done as part of upgrading a system, so you don't lose your work.
However, "ghosting" is in itself generally accepted as the former. Only an idiot would present a term the average bear knows one way without explaining their meaning. Then again, you haven't exactly given us much of a measure for critical thinking, bud. You're also arguing that the FBI sat on this, despite there being plentiful time before the election to examine the contents and then prosecute Biden? Even after Herr Trump appointed a guy to the FBI who would have zero scruples about hitting the Dems hard? Again, really stretching that suspension of disbelief, Clark. Try using a moustache with your disguise.
Honestly I'd be surprised if congressmen hadn't ignored him. Unlike the FBI it's not illegal to falsely report crimes to a congressmen so they end up getting all kinds of incredulous claims and accusations. Even the con-man Guiliani

verified the FBI had the evidence before doing anything.
You joking, or just a dumbass? A claim that only stands to benefit your party either way, and every member of congress ignored him? Do you even known what the logistics of something like that is? Someone aggressively seeking an outlet for this supposed "controversy" would have been granted an audience just to shut him up. Once any congressman saw that his claims were legit, this thing would have blown wide open. Hell, it took 3 years of the FBI investigating Trump to get as far they did, and they picked off people along the way. They only took so long because Trump was actively obstructing them at every step.
Having all the evidence in your lap is a far cry from being stone-walled at every step.
Fox news isn't really right wing. They've called the election for Biden after all. And the left did all jump on the dogpile alleging the laptop was part of a Russian misinformation op.
My roommate watches FOX news religiously, so I know you're full of shit. They've run the same bullshit story about election fraud the last week and change.
But it does, you just aren't in possession of any of the relevant information, actually you don't seem to be in possession of any information at all.
That projection, though.
Where are they? I'd like to speak with them.
I would love you name-drop the people who buy this bullshit as you do. Please, present evidence that it's not just you making a joke of yourself as you usually do.
Hot damn, you really are butthurt that I've got mod powers.
Not really. You took a job nobody else wanted, myself included. Being the bitch to another moderator isn't actually something to be proud of, either. You're the crew member at McDonald being shown how to work the grill. That's not a high bar.
So China IS competent? You're flip-flopping here man, not a good sign.
If you were a smarter man, I would accuse you of taking the piss. I can see, though, that you're just an ignorant little narcissist who can't see over his own ego to the reality before him. But, getting to your point, two things can be true at the same time. China can be as competent as Cobra Commander when it comes to taking over the world or keeping its house in order. They can also be competent enough to research potential marks and even carry out assassinations without it tracing back to them. It honestly comes down to who is in charge of what, same as it is elsewhere. Russia is only slightly more competent than they are, and the US is somewhere in the middle. Seriously, go do some research on the Cold War.
In case you were wondering, bud, here's a multiple choice of how rekt you just got:
[ ] Not rekt
[ ] Rekt
[ ] Partially rekt
[ ] Fucking rekt
[X] Obliterated
We're done here. You now have permission from Daddy Bob to go cry to your mommy about how torn apart your ass just got.