Re: Deadliest warrior awesomeness
Edit: Sniped while typing, but I'm not taking stuff out.
Tis a show on one of our stations here in the States (SpikeTV for me). They pit various warriors from various time periods (Pirate, Spartan, viking, ninja, knight that I recall being mentioned. They also did Mafia vs. Yakuza, too), comparing (mostly) weapons and basic techniques as put forth by a pair of experts in the chosen combatants. Then they run them through, like, 1000 simulated battles on a computer to see who'd come out on top. The only one I saw was Knight vs. Pirate. It's interesting, as it goes into some combat tactics as well as discussing the efficiency of various weaponry of the age. I'll admit, watching a great sword cleave through a pig was fun. It's one of those shows that really makes you go "daaayam!" when you see things in action.
Toxic, as for the ninja v. Spartan fight, I'd be inclined to agree with them not taking the full range of tactics into effect (Look! Rice! - Tenchu) but as my friend explained to me, and as they said on the show, "The ninja has many ways to hurt the Spartan (glass in the eyes, I'm sure they did shuriken, the katana v. that phlanax shield) but the Spartan has many ways to kill the ninja." In a straight up fight, I can see the Spartan taking it. In a "Let's throw them in the woods and see who comes out alive" scenario, I'd definitely have to go ninja.
Kind of like how they ran the knight v. pirate fight that I watched. A mounted knight weilding a mace/morning star and *charging* a pirate with it would likely dome him so badly he wouldn't know which way was up. However, it essentially turned into someone bringing a gun to a knife fight, which gave the pirate the advantage and thus the win.