I love how today's culture is to belittle a man instead of saying his wife is a cheating cunt.
Also I'd hardly call him a cuck. It's not like he's raised another man's kid then had to start paying alimony for the brat that isn't his because his wife divorced him to shack up with the actual father.
Which does happen... and somehow that has to keep paying alimony until either the kid is an adult or the ex-wife remarries (so instead she and new man live the married life only without the papers so the money keeps coming in). Now that, that is complete bullshit and total cuckoldry.
I mean, the age-old explanation was the man not being "man enough" to please his woman. Who knew that, in this day and age of entitlement, there would be contributing factors beyond a person's masculinity/honor/respect/etc and that the historical ideals of what is "manly" and what isn't were, by their very nature, "toxic." Well, a good number, anyways.
And, you're right. I think "cuck" is just generally a term that's wildly thrown about with no real appreciation for its true meaning. Kind of like how "racist", "nazi", "worse than Hitler", and "nigger" are tossed around like candy nowadays. You would be surprised by how indifferent I am to those words vs the younger me that might have been a bit bothered by it. Hell, someone calling me a "faggot" incites a playful back and forth.
And yet, the LGBTQ+ community is still bothered by words...
If a wife cheats, then..Yeah, technically the guy got cucked. But it's kinda shit to call him that when it wasn't his choice and he seems to be taking steps to deal with the situation
That wife deserves all the insults though, she's clearly just scum
I mean, the guy married her and chose to remain in a marriage that he either knew wasn't doing well, or was willfully ignorant of how bad things were. Either way, he could have called into question whether both sides were happy. If she cheated, I see it more as a failing on both sides to communicate their issues effectively rather than the woman being total garbage (which, she probably was, but semantics).
IDK
I just think this would have been a very foreseeable event for me when a woman that's 15 years younger starts cozying up to my rich ass.
If that were the case in this instance, well, they're both at fault and she's just a gold-digger.
You must be registered to see the links
I have to heartily disagree with this. What has this man done wrong? He participated in sexual intercourse with a consenting adult. It's not like he broke into their home and forced himself upon the wife.
Perhaps his actions were morally objectionable, but if we say that aren't we all in the same boat, humping our fists to pictures instead of being good christians?
I can understand the "victim" wanting to take his anger out on the other guy, since he's not allowed to beat on his ex-wife, and to admit that he'd chosen her poorly would damage his ego. But I'd think it should be clear to an impartial third party that the only guilt here lies with the adultress.
Fair points. Counterpoints:
1) Following impulses because of opportunity is indefensible, even if, from a purely moral position, we're all still hypocrites for saying the dude is a sack of shit. If I decide to rape a super-model, am I absolved of any guilt or fault because I was "just doing what nature demanded?" As long as we're playing with extremes, sir.
2) Everyone involved is a retard. The guy the chick cheated with for putting himself in a potentially-deadly situation (or, in this case, a financially-ruinous one); the chick for being a gold-digger and also failing to communicate her unhappiness with her husband; and the husband, for being such dense fuck that he didn't see trouble on the horizon and just wanted to settle for anything with a good cup size and a pair of legs.
You must be registered to see the links