Minerve, you worry to much mate
Opinions differ, they conflict, people might think they're better than you, will call you and the things you do stupid or foolish. Stupidity really is a loose term, it depends on perspective, I personally believe intelligence is the ability to recognize contradictions, which is the tool we (humanity) use to determine fact from fiction.
If you see something that you think is wrong, the first step is to imagine how someone would think that it's right, unless you understand someone, you will never be able to properly interact with them, and just throw up conflicts that lead to both sides rejecting the other.
Stupidity would be the inability to realize contradictions, but stupidity is a relative term, compared to a toddler anyone can be considered smart, compared to (I really hesitate and hate to say this, I'll explain later) a genius like myself, the majority of humanity can be called utterly stupid
Superiority as a concept is utterly flawed, you can never know who is better than someone simply because there are too many aspects to consider, and considering them would be a waste of your existence.
Let me explain what I mentioned before; out of thousands of tested individuals I've proven myself to be very far above average, and I've always considered myself to be fairly stupid, it came to me a shock that the majority of people were even worse than I was, which is a very depressing realization. It's also commonly known that intelligent people are incredibly prone to depression, while we may be better capable of discerning what is "correct" from what is "false" our ability to right wrongs is no better than average, realizing wrongs does not empower you to make things right, and intelligence is arguable more a burden than a boon, your very existence only has value due to its interactions, if you never interacted with anything, changed nothing, you might as well not have existed, if you're intelligent but there is no one capable of understanding you, a large part of your existence is essentially wasted. What I'm saying is that your "value" also in terms of better or worse, is decided by your amount of interactions (I won't give you my full essay on the meaning of life, I'll at least spare you that) and considering that something like that is pretty much immeasurable, attaching individual value to an immeasurable amount of interactions is utter folly, there's little difference between 100.000.000 interactions and 999.994.341 interactions anyway ;p
Imagine a world where no-one but you had eyes, would that make you better than them? Despite buildings not having lights and all of society would be designed to accommodate being blind, rather than being able to see. You could tell people what you see, but they wouldn't believe you, they wouldn't understand what "seeing" is because its not something they know.
Back to intelligence, if someone more intelligent than you realizes something that you don't, can't, understand, what is the point if he cannot communicate it, if you have an entity that is all-knowing, but can't do anything, is there any purpose behind that?
In the scope of society, being a genius in terms of intelligence is nothing to brag about, its a waste, pointless, Albert Einstein was a genius, and this theories led to some of the most pointless inventions humanity has ever made, simply because they couldn't understand much more than the simple bits (seriously, the A-bomb is the dumbest weapon you could possibly design)
Anyway, sorry about the rant, I really need to stop now before I really get going, I'll leave with this: You yourself are the only one that decides what is valuable and what isn't, that counts for everyone, and thus no one will hold the same values, thinking too much about what others value and how they measure what is valuable and what isn't is a waste of time
