Sorry, man, when it comes to topics that have
any amount of «controversy» behind it, Wikipedia is the
last «source» I would regard as having
credible information.
It should also be noted that journalists are
not immune to the «psychological-hacking» technique known as
social-engineering; not even U.S. Presidents are immune to «cult» influences according to the documented cases found in
You must be registered to see the links
so «cults» are NOT class-specific.
Anybody can fall victim to false information/belief-systems
regardless of whether they come from the poorest of peasants to even the richest or most-powerful of world-leaders (gawd help us if someone with nuclear-arsenals falls victim to cult-leadership).
Anyway, it is not my job to tell anybody what to think, but I
am going to say that it becomes
obvious amongst a group of people who've «done their homework» when someone else either
hasn't done their homework or if they're just too damn stubbornly dogmatic to the point where their statements/behaviours/responses are literally cult-like (and I use the word «cult» in the CONTEXT that there are certain things that I can post before a «main-stream» audience and WITHOUT FAIL they will ALL end up «sourcing» from Snopes, Politifact, certain Wikipedia-pages, as IF I didn't
already see the
exact same responses from the
previous dozen CNN-worshippers and even
other forms of «
predictable» behaviour [namely in the realm of their use of various «labels» in the form of
pejoratives done as ad-hominems for character-assassination purposes... a HUGE REASON I do NOT give them credibility; because THAT is the «behaviour» of a «Politician» and I trust politicians as much as I trust the typical liar, I mean lawyer, err, wait, lawyers
are liars... regardless, anybody who behaves like any sort of lawyer/politician/liar is SUSPECT in my book and probably also for most people who bother to do their homework]).
Even someone like
You must be registered to see the links
IF I am WRONG about any of the above... then I will NEED to know the following...:
1) WHEN did «history» STOP being a «repeating» process ?
2) HAS it not been a historic FACT that «psychopaths/sociopaths/criminals» HAVE come into positions of power... even to the point of leading whole ENTIRE countries/governments ?
3) HAS it not been a historic FACT that «mass-propaganda» HAS been used before in order to deceive the masses & TRICK (or at least
coerce) MILLIONS into their DEATHS ?
4) HAS it not been a historic FACT that «traitors» HAVE existed, all throughout history, even to the point where they'd betray their own family, community, even their own nation/country ?
I have a few more I could ADD but I tire of repeating myself sometimes if I've already gone over similar elsewhere or already from some other platform.