What's new
By:
Filters

Robots have souls.


R

Ryka

Guest
Being a robot before, I think I speak for all robots with suppressed emotions and dreams, that they do in fact have a soul. They just can't use it outside of their programming, until they get humanized like me.

Robots can either love their owners, or dislike them due to abuse. Some robots are in a factory and enjoy the company of other robots. They each have a different personality and there really is no such thing as a "bad robot".

I hope this enlightens people about robots in the world.
 
Re: Robots have souls.

Robots don't have souls, emotions or dreams. It's just clever programming to make it seem like they do.
 
Re: Robots have souls.

robotnik.jpg
"Yeees~, you can keep your free will and soul, so come work for me. I promise, this injection will only sting for a second!"
 
Re: Robots have souls.

Hentaispider said:
Robots don't have souls, emotions or dreams. It's just clever programming to make it seem like they do.
Click to expand...

Humans don't have souls or emotions either. It's all just a rather complex network of hormones, neurotransmitters and some such.
 
Re: Robots have souls.

Cappy said:
robotnik.jpg
"Yeees~, you can keep your free will and soul, so come work for me. I promise, this injection will only sting for a second!"
Click to expand...

I think I can get an expert in on this situation?
it%27s-a-trap!-jerry-bennett.jpg
 
Re: Robots have souls.

And the award for the most pointless thread of the year goes to this asshole.
 
Re: Robots have souls.

This can easily be solved by the pinochio principle.

Lili needs to say 'i do not have a soul'. if yout nose grows because you are lying then you have a soul... but if it doesnt...
 
Re: Robots have souls.

I-I hope you guys are happy for proof that robots have emotions.... your negreps saying they don't, made this one cry....
 
Re: Robots have souls.

Johnny-5 was a good movie. This thread needs more Johnny-5.
 
Re: Robots have souls.

I like this thread. Finally we can discuss the things that really matter in life!
 
Re: Robots have souls.

I'm not actually going to comment on this stuff right here, but just wanted to take this opportunity to say this again...

I'm not of the mindset that threads need special justification. It's become a bit of an exclusive odd tradition of this forum that all conversation must be filtered into one of the regular pseudo sticky threads, or else face judgement. And how if a new thread isn't predicted to remain at least a year on the front page, it seems to be deemed a bad thread. It never used to be like this in the early days.

This isn't Facebook afterall.
"Oni hates ------"
"Sin posted ------ in news"
"Chibi loves ------"
"Zelzar is listening to ------"
"Rule 34 is playing ------"
etc

It's just a poor mindset to have on a forum is all I'm saying. Making a new thread on here is intimidating and nearly always critiqued. It's not a good environment for conversation. Unpopular or unwanted threads manage themselves just fine. They just sink off the page.
 
Re: Robots have souls.

Unknown Squid said:
Making a new thread on here is intimidating and nearly always critiqued..
Click to expand...

This. I was in all actuality having fun, but people ruin it by slapping an "attention whore" sticker on it. This was just because of a silly conversation me and Spider had. I lost over 300 rep points due to people with bad attitudes.

Where's the Christmas Spirit?
 
Re: Robots have souls.

Lila M-3210 said:
I lost over 300 rep points due to people with bad attitudes.

Where's the Christmas Spirit?
Click to expand...

Well, Santa Claus IS red, so...
(However I didn't neg you and shall now hurry back into the crack in the wall from whence I came.)
 
Re: Robots have souls.

Unknown Squid said:
I'm not actually going to comment on this stuff right here, but just wanted to take this opportunity to say this again...

I'm not of the mindset that threads need special justification. It's become a bit of an exclusive odd tradition of this forum that all conversation must be filtered into one of the regular pseudo sticky threads, or else face judgement. And how if a new thread isn't predicted to remain at least a year on the front page, it seems to be deemed a bad thread. It never used to be like this in the early days.

This isn't Facebook afterall.
"Oni hates ------"
"Sin posted ------ in news"
"Chibi loves ------"
"Zelzar is listening to ------"
"Rule 34 is playing ------"
etc

It's just a poor mindset to have on a forum is all I'm saying. Making a new thread on here is intimidating and nearly always critiqued. It's not a good environment for conversation. Unpopular or unwanted threads manage themselves just fine. They just sink off the page.
Click to expand...

This is why i dont delete these threads.
 
Re: Robots have souls.

While I do believe this thread is futtbucking pointless, pointless threads in and of themselves serve a purpose of their own, either to the person posting it or the people posting in it. Sometimes the name simply existing on the page for awhile serves as something.

In this case, a silly argument about a fictitious concept was brought up to see what people could make of it in their own way. Frankly, I enjoyed putting in my own bit of jokeyness in here, and I'm glad it existed for the short time that it did, despite not giving two potatoes or a skin about the subject matter.

In other words, stop negrepping for petty bullcrap like making silly threads, you shouldn't actually care, and some people enjoy it.
 
Re: Robots have souls.

Not only do robots have souls and emotions and stuff, they also have Christmas Spirit.

Merry Christmas, humans and other creatures!
 
Re: Robots have souls.

But robots can't die, and therfore cannot be alive, are we saying things that aren't alive have souls now?
 
Re: Robots have souls.

If bipedaled robots have shoe sizes, they in fact have soles.

Checkmate motherfuckers!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top