What's new

ACT Loli Shota [ナップルミル] カボプリ3 -淫砂の踊り子- | カボプリ3 -幼艶の歌姫- (RJ419093) (RJ419116)


super_slicer

Lord High Inquisitor
Staff member
H-Section Moderator
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Messages
12,552
Reputation score
30,665
A little harsh imo. Can't blame him for not wanting to hold on to his posts until a thread is made
Nobody expects that. If what they have to say is so important shouldn't they be willing to make the new thread themselves?
 

ments

Evard's Tentacles of Forced Intrusion
Joined
Oct 31, 2011
Messages
1,028
Reputation score
551
A little harsh imo. Can't blame him for not wanting to hold on to his posts until a thread is made considering how fast you can burn through these kinda games.

Though with that said it's probably a good idea to link the new thread here:

[NappleMill / ナップルミル] バースト♀バスターズ -堕ちる魔女と寝取りの魔物- | -揺れる剣女と寝取りの魔物- (RJ01072009 | RJ01071990)
There are many pages who has been taken down, for not following law at origin country- the reason ULMF is still kicking is because they enforce their rules- harsh or not, rules are rules
 

alias34

Cthulhu
Joined
Oct 20, 2012
Messages
1,033
Reputation score
469
There are many pages who has been taken down, for not following law at origin country- the reason ULMF is still kicking is because they enforce their rules- harsh or not, rules are rules
I suppose? But this ban was about continuing to use this thread instead of making a new one so I don't know how this would relate to the law.
 

SoulLess Child

Active member
Joined
Nov 26, 2018
Messages
587
Reputation score
121
I suppose? But this ban was about continuing to use this thread instead of making a new one so I don't know how this would relate to the law.
a freaking admin asked to take the discussion about the new games to a new thread.
 

tabasco.tentacles

New member
Joined
May 19, 2022
Messages
3
Reputation score
0
No, but have a warning for necroing the thread without useful information.
I can only assume, that after being banned for contributing towards the discussion of a related game in the series, that everyone else discussing my ban will also be receiving bans for going off topic? Surely that would be consistent moderation, would it not?
 
Top