What's new
By:
Filters

Scourge of the Silver Marches D&D 3.5


Re: Scourge of the Silver Marches D&D 3.5

Thanks, Ryu. Never would have caught that myself. I've never played a barbarian before so this should be a different experience.

I also finished finally so let me know any other changes I should make, or things I missed.
 
Re: Scourge of the Silver Marches D&D 3.5

You should have 84 HP while raging, not 80. That's all I've noticed so far, might spot something else when I get back to an actual computer :)
 
Re: Scourge of the Silver Marches D&D 3.5

Oh okay, I didn't think my 2 levels of fighter counted for that. I was just using the classes that allowed me to rage. Easy change though.
 
Re: Scourge of the Silver Marches D&D 3.5

Yeah, its from the constitution bump, it also raises your Fort save by 2, if you didn't get that in yet :)
 
Re: Scourge of the Silver Marches D&D 3.5

I think you might have a few too many HP, Ronny...

You have 72. Your con bonus gives you a total of 30.
So 42.
lvl 1 barbarian - 12
30
2 more barb lvls - 12
18
2 fighter lvls - 10
8

I'm not sure what a battlerager's HD is, but unless it's a d16(which I doubt) or I'm missing something/calculating wrong......
 
Re: Scourge of the Silver Marches D&D 3.5

To calculate an average on a die, add 1 then divide by 2. Her should have 12 from barb 1, 13 from barb 2 and 3, eleven from fighter 1 and 2, and 6.5 from battlerager 1, which has a d12, for a total of 42.5, +the 30 from CON :)
 
Re: Scourge of the Silver Marches D&D 3.5

Are we operating on average or half? I thought we simply got half hp per level beyond first. So 2 from a d4, 3 from a d6, 4 from a d8, etc.
 
Re: Scourge of the Silver Marches D&D 3.5

I think we should over-rule the DM and use average, if we're gonna fight some epics we're gonna need every HP we can get :)
 
Re: Scourge of the Silver Marches D&D 3.5

Shrike7 said:
I think we should over-rule the DM and use average, if we're gonna fight some epics we're gonna need every HP we can get :)
Click to expand...

Now I have the mental image of a bunch of people walking up to a deity and saying its realm sucks so they're going to make some changes. Somehow I don't think things quite work that way.
 
Re: Scourge of the Silver Marches D&D 3.5

Funny you'd mention that, that was more or less what happenned the last time me and epic characters were said in the same sentence :) that was kinda the entire plot though, so its not quite the same...

EDIT: holy crap loli, you're in the tangled web too? So are me and my bf! Or do you just use the profiler?
 
Last edited:
Re: Scourge of the Silver Marches D&D 3.5

Loli... Jubilex... Really? I mean out of all the demon princes to serve you choose the demon prince of slimes?
 
Re: Scourge of the Silver Marches D&D 3.5

Pheonix Alugere said:
Loli... Jubilex... Really? I mean out of all the demon princes to serve you choose the demon prince of slimes?
Click to expand...

No other demon prince offers you the ability to create a wall of gelatinous cubes :|
 
Re: Scourge of the Silver Marches D&D 3.5

Still... he's a blob of demonic slime...
 
Re: Scourge of the Silver Marches D&D 3.5

Ya know, there used to be an amulet that allowed you to use a gelatinous cube as a mount :)
 
Re: Scourge of the Silver Marches D&D 3.5

On a more in character note: my character probably won't like yours loli. Granth has an Obyrith bloodline and you are devoted to a Tanar'ri prince.
 
Re: Scourge of the Silver Marches D&D 3.5

And her character is EVIL. But I guess that doesn't matter...
 
Re: Scourge of the Silver Marches D&D 3.5

Eh, I'm neutral, I'd probably have more problems with the whole lawful thing. Speaking of which: how does that work? Jubilex is chaotic evil not lawful evil.
 
Re: Scourge of the Silver Marches D&D 3.5

The class she took only requires her to be evil alignment. She's lawful because she's part monk.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top