The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version
- Thread starter Zepheral
- Start date
- #alllinesmatter #greenlinesmatter #redlinesmatter #tagcitybitch at least you tried stuffie drum_beat doesn't want sum ear sex at all drum_beat want sum ear sex too e-dick measuring every night the boogeyman checks under his bed for zepheral fuck stuffie's ears give pervy futa mistresses let's become retarded together! make ear creampies great again nobody wants to do pervy orgy like a sir stuffie ain't your sextoy stuffie is your sextoy after all stuffie wants sum ear fuk stuffie's ears are better than pussy ( ͡â° ͜ʖ ͡â°) tag space for sale there is a lot of cum in drum_beat reps thread with the weirdest tags... possibly tiny dicks zepheral is not perverted enough by my standards zepheral is too perverted even by my lowly standards
- Status
Stuffie
TouchFluffyEars
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2010
- Messages
- 4,742
- Reputation score
- 14,195
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version
W-while the ears are kind of sensitive, it's not as bad as my tail. But I g-guess that weird "Stuffie ears fetish" is doing its part here.
Why don't everyone just start nibbling on ToxicShoxic's ears for a change?
W-while the ears are kind of sensitive, it's not as bad as my tail. But I g-guess that weird "Stuffie ears fetish" is doing its part here.
Why don't everyone just start nibbling on ToxicShoxic's ears for a change?
Milia
Professional Neko Impersonator
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2016
- Messages
- 247
- Reputation score
- 505
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version
Oh your tail is sensitive huh? :3 ...
Playfully yanks Stuffies' floofy tail, snuggles, cuddles and nums it, stroking it gently, purring and nyaaing all the while.
Oh your tail is sensitive huh? :3 ...
Playfully yanks Stuffies' floofy tail, snuggles, cuddles and nums it, stroking it gently, purring and nyaaing all the while.
ponyguy3000
Demon Girl Master
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2017
- Messages
- 269
- Reputation score
- 500
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version
Nonsense. They should visit me instead.
XSI
Lurker
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 2,521
- Reputation score
- 423
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version
Sometimes I just don't have anything to say and will just go on my way
I do visit a lot of sub stuff. I just don't rep all the time
Sometimes I just don't have anything to say and will just go on my way
Byzantine2014
Tentacle God
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2014
- Messages
- 2,962
- Reputation score
- 5,335
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version
Not the best one, but meh
Also, thanks for the cookie Tungle! And just rep random people you semi agree with XSI
Not the best one, but meh
Also, thanks for the cookie Tungle! And just rep random people you semi agree with XSI
Last edited:
ASLPro3D
Jungle Girl
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2017
- Messages
- 18
- Reputation score
- 7
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version
Priceless... works for me!
Not the best one, but meh
Also, thanks for the cookie Tungle! And just rep random people you semi agree with XSI
Stuffie
TouchFluffyEars
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2010
- Messages
- 4,742
- Reputation score
- 14,195
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version
Y-you're welcome....? >.>;
That's what he wants you to believe, because pleasuring his ears gets him "up and running" almost instantly.
Y-you're welcome....? >.>;
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 11,239
- Reputation score
- 1,016
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version
Are you suggesting I get turned on by poisoning people?
Are you suggesting I get turned on by poisoning people?
Stuffie
TouchFluffyEars
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2010
- Messages
- 4,742
- Reputation score
- 14,195
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version
Well, you definitely enjoy pumping your essence into others, so I'd say yes?
XSI
Lurker
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 2,521
- Reputation score
- 423
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version
Oh boy, time for rep posting, about time we had that so we can point out the flaws
Plus, I like arguing this stuff. Nobody ever has reasonable, logical replies opposed to this
Negative one
http://www.ulmf.org/bbs/showthread.php?p=1000486#post1000486
Now it is true that Google itself isn't evil, they're just neglectful and allowing it to happen. But the act of getting someone fired over disagreeing politically is evil.
Now lets see what you said-
"Wrong ideas"
That's a big ol' Pandora's box you're opening up right there. Not only do you (Or Google for that matter) not have any authority to define what idea is wrong, this also leads down the path of suppressing thoughts. It is quite literally demanding that the ideas considered "right" go unchallenged, which means flaws in them will not be discussed, leading to an ideology that will be exploited or does not work when faced with reality.
As for deciding ideas are 'wrong', this is not only tribalistic attempting to dominate anyone not belonging to your ingroup of idealists having the 'right' ideas, but also opens the gate to having the roles reversed and having your ideas declared wrong by someone else and then suppressed. Kind of like how in the 1800s the idea that the peasants could vote was suppressed unsuccesfully by the rich.
Perhaps instead of thinking "Thog hate idea. Thog want idea banned. Thog like big man who hurt man who say bad idea", you should consider things from a modern society standpoint where we need to voice all ideas, no matter how stupid, so that we can dissect them and figure out why they are stupid and what caused them
As for him being 'wrong', I'd say it's the opposite. He voiced a fear that he and his ideas would be suppressed by the current powers there with punishments as a result of being 'found out', and that this leads to both stress and lower productivity.
And they tracked him down to fire him, thus proving him right.
If you are still of that opinion that Google did nothing wrong, please show yourself so that I may punish you for moving forward wrong ideas (Censorship, thoughtcrime, and suppression)
Oh boy, time for rep posting, about time we had that so we can point out the flaws
Plus, I like arguing this stuff. Nobody ever has reasonable, logical replies opposed to this
Negative one
http://www.ulmf.org/bbs/showthread.php?p=1000486#post1000486
Yes. Evil. A word I only use for those who are doing things that are purely negative, knowing that they are performing purely negative acts that only hurt.
Now it is true that Google itself isn't evil, they're just neglectful and allowing it to happen. But the act of getting someone fired over disagreeing politically is evil.
Now lets see what you said-
"Wrong ideas"
That's a big ol' Pandora's box you're opening up right there. Not only do you (Or Google for that matter) not have any authority to define what idea is wrong, this also leads down the path of suppressing thoughts. It is quite literally demanding that the ideas considered "right" go unchallenged, which means flaws in them will not be discussed, leading to an ideology that will be exploited or does not work when faced with reality.
As for deciding ideas are 'wrong', this is not only tribalistic attempting to dominate anyone not belonging to your ingroup of idealists having the 'right' ideas, but also opens the gate to having the roles reversed and having your ideas declared wrong by someone else and then suppressed. Kind of like how in the 1800s the idea that the peasants could vote was suppressed unsuccesfully by the rich.
Perhaps instead of thinking "Thog hate idea. Thog want idea banned. Thog like big man who hurt man who say bad idea", you should consider things from a modern society standpoint where we need to voice all ideas, no matter how stupid, so that we can dissect them and figure out why they are stupid and what caused them
As for him being 'wrong', I'd say it's the opposite. He voiced a fear that he and his ideas would be suppressed by the current powers there with punishments as a result of being 'found out', and that this leads to both stress and lower productivity.
And they tracked him down to fire him, thus proving him right.
If you are still of that opinion that Google did nothing wrong, please show yourself so that I may punish you for moving forward wrong ideas (Censorship, thoughtcrime, and suppression)
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2010
- Messages
- 12,546
- Reputation score
- 30,623
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version
I second the motion to bring this person into the light, not only do they support the detrimental all inclusive to be all inclusive movement but they also seem to fail at seeing the logical flaw they've made: In order to be all inclusive, you have to include everyone EVEN PEOPLE WHO DON'T WANT TO INCLUDE EVERYONE for the sake of including everyone.
I second the motion to bring this person into the light, not only do they support the detrimental all inclusive to be all inclusive movement but they also seem to fail at seeing the logical flaw they've made: In order to be all inclusive, you have to include everyone EVEN PEOPLE WHO DON'T WANT TO INCLUDE EVERYONE for the sake of including everyone.
dragoon93041
Tentacle God
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2011
- Messages
- 1,897
- Reputation score
- 3,182
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version
Alright, I understand why they want to censor a guy who is for censorship but I'm not sure what "Identity Crisis" (thought it was Infinity Crisis and was really confused) and employment have to do with it.
Alright, I understand why they want to censor a guy who is for censorship but I'm not sure what "Identity Crisis" (thought it was Infinity Crisis and was really confused) and employment have to do with it.
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2008
- Messages
- 11,998
- Reputation score
- 430
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version
Apparently he already got a job offer from Assange.
HentaiWriter
Tentacle God
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2014
- Messages
- 751
- Reputation score
- 366
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version
Just got called a "liar" for this post lmao;
http://www.ulmf.org/bbs/showpost.php?p=1001156&postcount=486
despite everything in the post being factually accurate and able to be proven just by simply going to said websites and checking the posts, etc.
Just got called a "liar" for this post lmao;
http://www.ulmf.org/bbs/showpost.php?p=1001156&postcount=486
despite everything in the post being factually accurate and able to be proven just by simply going to said websites and checking the posts, etc.
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2010
- Messages
- 12,546
- Reputation score
- 30,623
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version
They're just being whiney cunts cuz you're not giving them free porn RIGHT NAO.
They're just being whiney cunts cuz you're not giving them free porn RIGHT NAO.
- Status