What's new

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version

Creeps up behind Stuffie, nums on ear and nyaas seductively.
 
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version

Creeps up behind Stuffie, nums on ear and nyaas seductively.

giphy.gif


W-while the ears are kind of sensitive, it's not as bad as my tail. But I g-guess that weird "Stuffie ears fetish" is doing its part here.
Why don't everyone just start nibbling on ToxicShoxic's ears for a change? ;)
 
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version

Oh your tail is sensitive huh? :3 ...
Playfully yanks Stuffies' floofy tail, snuggles, cuddles and nums it, stroking it gently, purring and nyaaing all the while.
 
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version

56988398.jpg

Not the best one, but meh

Also, thanks for the cookie Tungle! And just rep random people you semi agree with XSI :D
 
Last edited:
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version

Aren't they, you know, Toxic?

That's what he wants you to believe, because pleasuring his ears gets him "up and running" almost instantly. ;)

HrDJpid.jpg


Y-you're welcome....? >.>;
 
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version

Are you suggesting I get turned on by poisoning people?
 
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version

Oh boy, time for rep posting, about time we had that so we can point out the flaws
Plus, I like arguing this stuff. Nobody ever has reasonable, logical replies opposed to this

Negative one
http://www.ulmf.org/bbs/showthread.php?p=1000486#post1000486
Evil? Really? He was punished because he is wrong and for attempting to move forward wrong ideas.

Yes. Evil. A word I only use for those who are doing things that are purely negative, knowing that they are performing purely negative acts that only hurt.

Now it is true that Google itself isn't evil, they're just neglectful and allowing it to happen. But the act of getting someone fired over disagreeing politically is evil.
Now lets see what you said-
"Wrong ideas"

That's a big ol' Pandora's box you're opening up right there. Not only do you (Or Google for that matter) not have any authority to define what idea is wrong, this also leads down the path of suppressing thoughts. It is quite literally demanding that the ideas considered "right" go unchallenged, which means flaws in them will not be discussed, leading to an ideology that will be exploited or does not work when faced with reality.
As for deciding ideas are 'wrong', this is not only tribalistic attempting to dominate anyone not belonging to your ingroup of idealists having the 'right' ideas, but also opens the gate to having the roles reversed and having your ideas declared wrong by someone else and then suppressed. Kind of like how in the 1800s the idea that the peasants could vote was suppressed unsuccesfully by the rich.

Perhaps instead of thinking "Thog hate idea. Thog want idea banned. Thog like big man who hurt man who say bad idea", you should consider things from a modern society standpoint where we need to voice all ideas, no matter how stupid, so that we can dissect them and figure out why they are stupid and what caused them

As for him being 'wrong', I'd say it's the opposite. He voiced a fear that he and his ideas would be suppressed by the current powers there with punishments as a result of being 'found out', and that this leads to both stress and lower productivity.
And they tracked him down to fire him, thus proving him right.

If you are still of that opinion that Google did nothing wrong, please show yourself so that I may punish you for moving forward wrong ideas (Censorship, thoughtcrime, and suppression)
 
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version

I second the motion to bring this person into the light, not only do they support the detrimental all inclusive to be all inclusive movement but they also seem to fail at seeing the logical flaw they've made: In order to be all inclusive, you have to include everyone EVEN PEOPLE WHO DON'T WANT TO INCLUDE EVERYONE for the sake of including everyone.
 
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version

I strongly suspect that the individual is about to have an Identity Crisis... and difficultly finding any work in the foreseeable future.
 
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version

Alright, I understand why they want to censor a guy who is for censorship but I'm not sure what "Identity Crisis" (thought it was Infinity Crisis and was really confused) and employment have to do with it.
 
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version

I strongly suspect that the individual is about to have an Identity Crisis... and difficultly finding any work in the foreseeable future.

Apparently he already got a job offer from Assange.
 
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version

They're just being whiney cunts cuz you're not giving them free porn RIGHT NAO.
 
Re: The Reputation Hilarity/Insanity thread New version

Maybe it's hopeful thinking on their part?
Still sounds like just a dumbass
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top