- Joined
- Nov 9, 2008
- Messages
- 3,042
- Reputation score
- 182
My nightmares will be very wet.Idiots. If they had just kept on with allowing it, and even accepted it, they'd get whatYou must be registered to see the linksYou must be registered to see the linksYou must be registered to see the linksYou must be registered to see the linksYou must be registered to see the links, and their business likely would have benefited at least somewhat from it.
Pretty sure the BBC moderates comments.If anything, I'd expect a trollface in ANSI there at some point
Books themselves are a long way off from going bye bye... however with the internet right freaking there it's not difficult to look up what a word means. That and Oxford releases a new version every so often, so I assume a lot of people don't get one because... they already have one.You must be registered to see the links
Apparently the internet is killing off printed works.
*yawns* I wonder if Justin has ever posted on 4chan?You must be registered to see the links
Bosnia is a fucked up place, but more so there are fucked up people all over the world. There is probly a fuck ton of people here in North America that do the exact same thing.You must be registered to see the links
Excuse me while I find a flight to Bosnia.
If you like puppies, you may only past the first bit without getting angry. If you don't like puppies, you may just feel outraged that someone would do this to something that helpless, and lastly if you're like the monstrous little shit in the video (May you be cursed with an incurable disease) you might laugh.
Or, you know, you might realize that if she doesn't have a lot of money, she might not be able to keep them and she probably has better uses for the time and money it would take to take them to the vet to be killed(if that's even a realistic option). Granted, the manner in which she kills them could be more appropriate, but I'd bet it's easier to drown them than kill them with knife(even though latter would be, if done correctly, less painful for them). And it's not like she tortured them or anything.You must be registered to see the links
Excuse me while I find a flight to Bosnia.
If you like puppies, you may only past the first bit without getting angry. If you don't like puppies, you may just feel outraged that someone would do this to something that helpless, and lastly if you're like the monstrous little shit in the video (May you be cursed with an incurable disease) you might laugh.
Recording it does seem to suggest something otherwise. If I was in a situation where it was only logical to dump the pups, then I certainly wouldn't film it. I would have too much guilt to do anything to further what's actually happening, and I mean anything. I would feel bad having other people around to help or even watch.There was a time when throwing a weighted sackful of newborn puppies in a river was common practice, because you couldn't take care of the full litter. I doubt that there just happened to be a person with a barrel of puppies and a second person willing to record these puppies being thrown into a river. Bosnia's a third world country, I doubt the residents have the time, resources, or inclination to do right by a litter of pups. That being said, I don't know why they'd need it recorded, why they'd upload it to youtube after, and why they didn't do something more discreet, like leaving them in a sack full of rocks.
There is probly a fuck ton of people here in North America that do the exact same thing.
She was laughing. VIDEOTAPING. That suggests this was done for shits and giggles than out of any real need to find a way to get rid of them.Or, you know, you might realize that if she doesn't have a lot of money, she might not be able to keep them and she probably has better uses for the time and money it would take to take them to the vet to be killed(if that's even a realistic option). Granted, the manner in which she kills them could be more appropriate, but I'd bet it's easier to drown them than kill them with knife(even though latter would be, if done correctly, less painful for them). And it's not like she tortured them or anything.
There are quicker and cleaner ways. Drowning is inhumane.Maybe she figured that if she has to get rid of them, it might be done with style?
Point taken, but I fail to see how that was particularly cruel or inhumane. Anyway, it's just possible that it was, in fact, a humane deed(despite all evidence to the contrary). Infection, birth defects, hereditary disease...