In today's news...
- Thread starter Loli Defense Force
- Start date
Copper
Lurker
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 8,967
- Reputation score
- 397
Re: In today's news...
Well, it's well into Sunday, looks like my friend doesn't get the Apocalypse for her birthday. Ah well. Loved the pictures. They totally made my night!
And Toxic, funny that you should say that. "The Raptor" is Gaia's joke take on the Rapture.
Reminds me of that old GI Joe episode...
"The Viper is coming..."
Well, it's well into Sunday, looks like my friend doesn't get the Apocalypse for her birthday. Ah well. Loved the pictures. They totally made my night!
And Toxic, funny that you should say that. "The Raptor" is Gaia's joke take on the Rapture.
Reminds me of that old GI Joe episode...
"The Viper is coming..."
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2008
- Messages
- 6,983
- Reputation score
- 434
Ranger Princess
Tentacle God
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 2,030
- Reputation score
- 342
Re: In today's news...
I really enjoyed this article on "orgasmic meditation."
You must be registered to see the links
I really enjoyed this article on "orgasmic meditation."
SirOni
Demon Girls #1 Fan
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 7,206
- Reputation score
- 493
Re: In today's news...
So Bart and I stumbled about
So Bart and I stumbled about
You must be registered to see the links
little article about setting your gay daughters straight. Not sure how old it is but the woman is fucking batshit insane.
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 971
- Reputation score
- 58
Re: In today's news...
If she's not trolling, 'fucking batshit insane' doesn't quite describe it.
Trolling. In the comments of another article she wrote on
You must be registered to see the links
, she's accusing people of homophobia.If she's not trolling, 'fucking batshit insane' doesn't quite describe it.
Re: In today's news...
The comments are the worst... Her replies are apalling. If it's of any comfort, I think she's either a high class troll or bipolar. Click on her name under the heading, and look at her other articles... Bitch be crazy.
The comments are the worst... Her replies are apalling. If it's of any comfort, I think she's either a high class troll or bipolar. Click on her name under the heading, and look at her other articles... Bitch be crazy.
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 11,239
- Reputation score
- 1,017
Re: In today's news...
I haven't read it, but is there at all a possibility her case is just that homosexuality can be changed by environment? If not I can't see how she's not a troll.
*edit*
We here at the Ladies’ Monthly have a long standing, strong relationship with the LGBTQCHFLOLOMG community,
Where does the LGBTQCHFLOLOMG in the LGBTQCHFLOLOMG community stands for? I get the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bi Transexual), but I’m lost after the Q.
Wow, you must not be up on the times. Q: Queer, C: Cis, H: Hipster, F: Futanari, L: Lavender Children, O: Orgiast, L: Liliputian, O: Omnisexual, M: Meineke, and G: Godian (loving God sexually).
Haha, I think I love this person!
Well the Lesbian Gay Bi Transexual Queer Cis Hipster Futanari Lavender Orgiast Liliputian Omnisexual Meineke Godian community, of course
I haven't read it, but is there at all a possibility her case is just that homosexuality can be changed by environment? If not I can't see how she's not a troll.
*edit*
We here at the Ladies’ Monthly have a long standing, strong relationship with the LGBTQCHFLOLOMG community,
Where does the LGBTQCHFLOLOMG in the LGBTQCHFLOLOMG community stands for? I get the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bi Transexual), but I’m lost after the Q.
Wow, you must not be up on the times. Q: Queer, C: Cis, H: Hipster, F: Futanari, L: Lavender Children, O: Orgiast, L: Liliputian, O: Omnisexual, M: Meineke, and G: Godian (loving God sexually).
Haha, I think I love this person!
Well the Lesbian Gay Bi Transexual Queer Cis Hipster Futanari Lavender Orgiast Liliputian Omnisexual Meineke Godian community, of course
Last edited:
Magus
Banned
- Joined
- May 12, 2009
- Messages
- 139
- Reputation score
- 94
Re: In today's news...
*ears perk up*
Did someone call for a troll?
If so, can I conjure up a few things to incite rage? No? Uh... uh... Maybe hurt pride or... um cause sore butt syndromes? I can even use my tired trademark standby line: "you're like toonpimp because...." Cmon, please let me rip em? I'm still an idiot, right? Guys?? *nervous chuckle, and peers over shoulder*
Bah I'm not even good at this anymore, I think I've lost my edge after falling in love, and it just doesn't piss anyone off anymore like it used to :'(
Or perhaps I've gone soft.
*ears perk up*
Did someone call for a troll?
If so, can I conjure up a few things to incite rage? No? Uh... uh... Maybe hurt pride or... um cause sore butt syndromes? I can even use my tired trademark standby line: "you're like toonpimp because...." Cmon, please let me rip em? I'm still an idiot, right? Guys?? *nervous chuckle, and peers over shoulder*
Bah I'm not even good at this anymore, I think I've lost my edge after falling in love, and it just doesn't piss anyone off anymore like it used to :'(
Or perhaps I've gone soft.
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2008
- Messages
- 11,998
- Reputation score
- 431
Re: In today's news...
You were never good at it.*ears perk up*
Did someone call for a troll?
If so, can I conjure up a few things to incite rage? No? Uh... uh... Maybe hurt pride or... um cause sore butt syndromes? I can even use my tired trademark standby line: "you're like toonpimp because...." Cmon, please let me rip em? I'm still an idiot, right? Guys?? *nervous chuckle, and peers over shoulder*
Bah I'm not even good at this anymore, I think I've lost my edge after falling in love, and it just doesn't piss anyone off anymore like it used to :'(
Or perhaps I've gone soft.
Magus
Banned
- Joined
- May 12, 2009
- Messages
- 139
- Reputation score
- 94
Re: In today's news...
ehh, good enough to get you to -rep me still. That's all that matters.
As long as I'm pissing SOMEONE off, I guess I haven't lost my touch after all <3
Thank you for your kind contribution. You make me feel like life is worth it, spider
ehh, good enough to get you to -rep me still. That's all that matters.
As long as I'm pissing SOMEONE off, I guess I haven't lost my touch after all <3
Thank you for your kind contribution. You make me feel like life is worth it, spider
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2008
- Messages
- 11,998
- Reputation score
- 431
Re: In today's news...
When did I last negrep you, anyway? Not for that post, that's for certain.ehh, good enough to get you to -rep me still. That's all that matters.
As long as I'm pissing SOMEONE off, I guess I haven't lost my touch after all <3
Thank you for your kind contribution. You make me feel like life is worth it, spider
Ranger Princess
Tentacle God
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 2,030
- Reputation score
- 342
Re: In today's news...
Hey guys remember Schwarzenegger v EMA, the US Supreme Court case we talked about a while ago where California wanted to restrict violent video games to people under 18? Well now its called Brown v. EMA and the Supreme Court just decided to strike down the law today 7-2. Justices Breyer and Thomas were the unlikely duo opposed. I usually don't like Scalia but he does have his moments...I mean comparing video games to works of art is a freaking awesome argument. And Justice Sotomayor will be pleased that BUGS BUNNY IS SAVED.
Quotes from the Examiner
"Gamers everywhere can breathe a sigh of relief: The U.S. Supreme Court, in the case of Brown v. EMA, voted 7-2 against a California law that would've prohibited the sale of violent video games to minors (with a $1,000 fine for violators) and upheld the First Amendment rights of the video game industry.
The court said: "Video games qualify for First Amendment protection. Like protected books, plays, and movies, they communicate ideas through familiar literary devices and features distinctive to the medium. And “the basic principles of freedom of speech . . . do not vary” with a new and different communication medium."
Justice Scalia, in his criticism of the California law, compared violent video games to more violent literary works such as The Divine Comedy, Grimm's Fairy Tales, and The Odyssey, saying that such works are accessible to children and do contain gore."
Hey guys remember Schwarzenegger v EMA, the US Supreme Court case we talked about a while ago where California wanted to restrict violent video games to people under 18? Well now its called Brown v. EMA and the Supreme Court just decided to strike down the law today 7-2. Justices Breyer and Thomas were the unlikely duo opposed. I usually don't like Scalia but he does have his moments...I mean comparing video games to works of art is a freaking awesome argument. And Justice Sotomayor will be pleased that BUGS BUNNY IS SAVED.
Quotes from the Examiner
"Gamers everywhere can breathe a sigh of relief: The U.S. Supreme Court, in the case of Brown v. EMA, voted 7-2 against a California law that would've prohibited the sale of violent video games to minors (with a $1,000 fine for violators) and upheld the First Amendment rights of the video game industry.
The court said: "Video games qualify for First Amendment protection. Like protected books, plays, and movies, they communicate ideas through familiar literary devices and features distinctive to the medium. And “the basic principles of freedom of speech . . . do not vary” with a new and different communication medium."
Justice Scalia, in his criticism of the California law, compared violent video games to more violent literary works such as The Divine Comedy, Grimm's Fairy Tales, and The Odyssey, saying that such works are accessible to children and do contain gore."
You must be registered to see the links
Serpentar
Lurker
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2009
- Messages
- 97
- Reputation score
- 7
Re: In today's news...
Relief at least. Considering that a good chunk of games have violence of some sort. Plus honestly ESRB ratings are there for a reason, and parents are there for a reason. No need to get the government involved.
Relief at least. Considering that a good chunk of games have violence of some sort. Plus honestly ESRB ratings are there for a reason, and parents are there for a reason. No need to get the government involved.