Twisted
Mega Ultimate Jungle Girl 2000 Redux Z
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 2,027
- Reputation score
- 199
Re: alice in wonderland
You mean more than the original book, right? =P (in reference to Charlie) It wasn't meant to be a remake of the Gene Wilder movie, it was meant as a new adaption of the book (which I have yet to read, sadly :<)
But as for the movie, it really doesn't look or feel appealing to me from what I've seen of it, as far as trailers and clips from the movie that I've seen - and I've barely heard anything good about it. I've pretty much heard that it's what Charlie was - Looks great, a visual acid trip, but that's just about it.
That and the Alice in the movie really puts me off a bit :|
You mean more than the original book, right? =P (in reference to Charlie) It wasn't meant to be a remake of the Gene Wilder movie, it was meant as a new adaption of the book (which I have yet to read, sadly :<)
Escape from Wonderland is the third, isn't it? Wasn't it Return to Wonderland->Beyond Wonderland->Escape from Wonderland?Escape is rather good. I'm still awaiting them to release the third one.
As for Burtonizing it... he actually did a rather good job. You can't really make Alice in Wonderland weird, as its already fairly weird to begin with. I think the actor's did a wonderful job with this, they're who really pull everything off.
But as for the movie, it really doesn't look or feel appealing to me from what I've seen of it, as far as trailers and clips from the movie that I've seen - and I've barely heard anything good about it. I've pretty much heard that it's what Charlie was - Looks great, a visual acid trip, but that's just about it.
That and the Alice in the movie really puts me off a bit :|