Re: Are Traps Gay?
Wrong. Futa have both sets of genitalia. What you're thinking of is a dickgirl or newhalf.
It's still a chick with a dick, bro. Label it what you want, but she still has male genitalia. Extra accessories doesn't suddenly change the mechanics of how a dick works or what it is.
Well there are certainly incorrect answers, such as rape and pedophilia. Which means there must be correct answers.
Rape is actionable, and having such a fetish is personal. If you have rape fantasies about yourself being forcefully violated, that's your thing. I can't call it weird anymore than I can call having a foot fetish weird. I mean, in my personal opinion, they are. The major point is, rape is an act outside the scope of a fetish until it actually factors into someone's psychology as something to get off to.
Pedophilia is another matter altogether. I personally find it objectionable and have strong views about how to handle people who have it as a fetish, but that's not my place to judge, either. We could probably go all day about what fetishes are objectionable and which ones are fine by "normal" social standards; but, then, you get into a messy topic of "what is normal?" I feel like just discussing what is "right" or "wrong" as a fetish is going too far off-topic as-is.
Still wasn't talking about traps, no matter how much you try to muddy the water.
Who's muddying the water? I posted a screencap which suggested futa on chick was less gay than male on female. The end result was essentially "sexuality isn't black and white, it's all personal." And it really is, unless you're some uptight prude who
must have everything categorized according to a general consensus rather than think for yourself.
Okay, now you're just being obtuse.
so is there a definite answer for this?
Nope. Sexuality is subjective. Traps being "gay" is a purely subjective viewpoint.
is "being"gay the new Vegan?
And as obnoxious and annoying!
people who are really straight aren't straight at all?
OMG!! I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU JUST SAID THAT! LIKE, I CAN'T EVEN!
But, seriously, it depends on what your definition of being "straight" is. Generally, it's "I like the opposite sex, find my own sex unappealing sexually, and won't comment on whether a member of my own sex is attractive in a subjective sense." If you're like me, though, you'll still prefer banging a chick over a dude, but can find a dude attractive enough to understand why he might be sexually attractive to both sides. I also have more shit going on in my head than a schizophrenic, so take that as you will.
what the fuck are we then?
Beans, son. Lots, and lots of beans.
are we gonna go with the "gender is a social construct" argument?
You must be registered to see the links
Gender and sexuality are only relative to how they apply to the individual. Separate, the former is a scientific fact not subjective to personal preference. If you're born with one set of genitalia (or both), you belong to that category of gender. Sorry, but you can't take a fact and change it to what you prefer because it's inconvenient.
The latter is a matter of social design. Sexuality has, and always has been, a result of contributing factors in one's upbringing. Things such as environment, upbringing, familial ties, community, social norms, etc have a strong influence on how one views their own sexuality.
OH WOW, are you implying that being gay or trans is a new trend for being part of "cool kids"?
You're not cool if you're not a male in a female body! Gawd! Are you even
trying to be on the right side of history, Yoshiiki?
"gender is a social construct"
Lol, you don't want to go there, ideology is stronger than facts and logic
Ideology leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to 10,000+ blogs about how everyone is trans-/homo-/islamo-/otherkin-/phobic and lots of crying babies in a safe space, playing with play-doh and hugging dogs.
I totally skipped over everything that was just said because it looked like it would kill my metaphorical boner.
Too big. A trap must have a cute, girlish dick.
