BurningGold
Lurker
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2009
- Messages
- 2,316
- Reputation score
- 16
@BurningGold: Not at all.
@RJ: Respond to my thread damnit. It's been 2 days and you've been on several times.
There wouldn't be one, given the current Luna. And if that child was a result of Luna being raped, she'd choke it to death with her own hands ;X.
Ai yai yai. This diplomacy bit's not going well at all, is it? River totally missed Emilia's allusion to futa-feeding, and her adherence to sleeping alone is seriously discouraging Emilia.
Now, I can't say that River's attitude is non-representative, but Emilia's attempts to dance around the issues are clearly going over River's head. I'm sure that by now Emilia would be recognizing that River's a very direct sort of person. She needs to get River into some office-type setting - something formal and official - and tell her using short words what the situation is.
"We have to have nightly sex with ordinary women. If we don't, we start trying to rape them the next day."
Umm, yeah... remind me again why Luna would kill a perfectly innocent, completely sin-less (even by her standards, I would say) 100% non-monstrous human being? it confuses me...
exactly, and I already plan on sticking that into my next post, with particular reference to what she's heard about Jesse![]()
Err... no... >.>. "Spawn of the devil", think towards that direction... A "child" =/= automatically innocent in her book, and if it was the result of a rapist human/sinner... that, by her twisted standards, would automatically equate it as evil.
To make things simple: Luna is horribly biased in her judging on the "Worth of Existence", and highly whimsical at that. Were she to be raped and become pregnant with the rapist's child as a result, she would most likely used twisted logic to "define" the unwanted child as "evil". And then use that as "proper reason" to kill the child.
(I think that's the proper explaination for it, just woke up and I'm groggy as hell...)
Luna would not come up with the idea that "the child is not responsible for the sins of the father". Or at least that's how it sounds to me.So basically Luna would just make an excuse to define that child as evil so she can killz it?