Regardless of how advanced you perceived roman society to be has little to no relation to the subject of how soldiers would react when faced with decimation.
Just because the Roman's used a judicial system doesn't mean they were any more civil than you or i, they murdered Caesar on the senate floor for Christ sakes and in much the same way as i had described. no apologies, no regrets, just a knife in the guts.
If the most civil and intelligent of roman's were willing to commit murder because they were being oppressed by a tyrant, think of what a common soldier would have done when it was his life on the line.
politics breeds enemies, soldiering breeds brothers... (all this is entirely platonic)
Julius Caesar was the leader of the Roman Republic. His assassination led to many civil wars and the ascension of his... nephew I think, as the first Roman Emperor.
Have you read the wiki article on him? He was actually a pretty good guy. Wanted to build a Library to rival Alexandria. The wiki also says "Caesar is deemed to be one of the greatest military commanders of history." He wasn't a tyrant at all. He was especially popular with the middle and lower classes. His assassination was done by men who wanted his position and the ability to destroy the unification he was working towards.
And Nunu has the point. Political enemies will do anything for power. I can't pretend to know anything about soldiers though, considering I've never been one. Maybe someone who has should comment on the situation?
I will post the story for you.Maybe she likes to Sin Chibi? Heh, that came out kind of funny.
And Serifyn, you really have no idea on the ties that soldiers build with each other, especially through times of war, and you really have no idea what a modern battlefield is like if you think modern soldiers can't relate to the Roman soldiers on the aspect of war. Sure we may not be decimated by our own commanders, but war is still war, and taking human life is still taking human life.
I can imagine that if from an army of soldiers who have fought and bled together were forced to kill one of their own, his friends would not like to do it but have little choice in the matter (the alternative is a better legion would probly come in and crucify all of them). It wouldn't be relief, there'd be horror on their faces. As for the man getting killed, the Roman's were enough about honor that he'd probly be able to face it well enough to restore his family's name.
Even cowards wouldn't find it easy to kill their friends.
And, i dunno. She thinks marriage equality is great, but oh no, it's still a sin. She confuses the crap out of me.
If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you;
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
But make allowance for their doubtings too;
Put here any word you want like "catholic", "christian", "jew", "muslim", or else...
Just think twice before you negrep me: if you negrep me, it's 'cos you know and undertsand what i wanted to say though you didn't want to hear or to see the truth.
Minerve, it's great that you have an opinion and have decided upon your own way of life, but if you constantly harp on about Religious folks all being assholes you are going to piss people off, me included. So keep it to yourself.
You're making broad generalisations about groups you haven't been a part of based on what other people have told you. Religious groups as an organization might have some corruption, but calling everybody who follows a church an asshole because they follow a church is you being presumptuous and offensive. Last time I checked, the only truly homophobic church that went out of it's way to bother people out of the MANY in my country is Westboro Baptist.
Like I said, you can believe what you want about religious groups and entities, but keep that to yourself unless you want to start arguments.
Since you're only interested in throwing your opinion out there for the world to see without even considering others' I'll just keep the writing to myself when I finish it.
And Serifyn, you really have no idea on the ties that soldiers build with each other, especially through times of war, and you really have no idea what a modern battlefield is like if you think modern soldiers can't relate to the Roman soldiers on the aspect of war. Sure we may not be decimated by our own commanders, but war is still war, and taking human life is still taking human life.
I can imagine that if from an army of soldiers who have fought and bled together were forced to kill one of their own, his friends would not like to do it but have little choice in the matter (the alternative is a better legion would probly come in and crucify all of them). It wouldn't be relief, there'd be horror on their faces. As for the man getting killed, the Roman's were enough about honor that he'd probly be able to face it well enough to restore his family's name.