The Ranting/Debate Thread

[ToxicShock]

Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread

Just to clarify, I wasn't trying to joke. We can argue this til we're blue in the face, but make sure you're coming off the same ground. You can't argue stipulations of sexuality without having a solid social/scientific definition of sexuality, and you can't even have that without first talking about gender itself, which is not as black and white as people suggest.

So, where do we wanna start? Cuz I'm pretty sure we can just jump right into assumption on the important two categories if we want to dive headfirst into misunderstanding

 

[Wonderboy]

Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread

Lol, Kusa, you're probably right.

Anyways, wanting to suck a dick seems to me like a fetish that may spring fourth from some form of supressed homosexual preference. However, there's a big difference between having a slight fixation for Futa penises and being a fully blown Homosexual. Also, is there such a thing as a being a homophile in english? One's the sexuality, the other is the emotions? I myself have a hard time fapping to exclusive futa porn, and much prefer a futa banging a regular chick. But that's because that dick could be attached to a tree, I don't care.

Also, from

You must be registered to see the links

" I'm not entirely sure as to the origins, but it's been bouncing around as long as hentai has. The armchair shrink analysis of the futanari fetish goes something like this: A man, usually a total heterosexual, finds something arousing about the sight of a penis, or penis abuse. Understandably, masturbating to a picture of a man's penis could feel somewhat awkard. Masturbating to a man's penis being abused could be both awkward and difficult, seeing as one might sympathize with the poor guy's member. By removing the man from the equation (but not the penis), the futanari enthusiast can jerk it till doomsday, 100% guilt free. "

 

[SirOni]

Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread

Vuki stated he didn't like that there's more consensual than non-consensual hentai.

Sin stated she liked the consensual stuff.

Vuki said she didn't have reason to complain; Sin said she wasn't.

Vuki said he himself SHOULD be complaining; Sin stated why it might be hard to get people to listen.

Vuki stated that he gets annoyed by people stating the obvious.

WB came in andMOREBLOODFORTHEBLOODGOD!

At least, that's how I read it >.<

Oh okay, lol I did misinterpret that a bit wrong. Though most of the tentacle hentai I've got seems to be non-submissive. Or at least, thats what I tell myself

And no problem, Sin. Funnily enough Inju Otoko has an account on this forum. I get bored sometimes so I like to see what members we have, and I found him. Well, I say I found him, Rule got to him before I had the chance.

 

[Sinfulwolf]

Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread

Oh okay, lol I did misinterpret that a bit wrong. Though most of the tentacle hentai I've got seems to be non-submissive. Or at least, thats what I tell myself

And no problem, Sin. Funnily enough Inju Otoko has an account on this forum. I get bored sometimes so I like to see what members we have, and I found him. Well, I say I found him, Rule got to him before I had the chance.

We have him here? That's... amusing actually. Unfortunate that he doesn't partake... or he partakes in threads I don't visit.

 

[Exofluke]

Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread

For starters, there's no right or wrong to this evaluation. We're only segregating based on actions. One person decides to go for the vagina, then we call it this. The other side goes for the opposite, so we call it that. Nothing is right or wrong here....

Point being, there is the separation, gay... not gay... whatever, just two sides of the same coin (is that the second time I used that metaphor?). Everything, for humans, is the same; especially when it's human on human. So I would say that there is gay... it's just your understanding of that line that separates hetereo and homo. How thick do you make it? If you even have the line. I would also suggest that the separation is, like most segregated things, just a way to understand. Having that line helps us to know things. The less segregated, the less we'll be able to understand the complexities. In this case, to understand why a human chooses man over woman.

 

[Wonderboy]

Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread

I think gay not gay would be more appropriately two sides of the same ball^^

There seems to be so many gray areas at the circumference...

Like the guy that likes girls with penises, and wants to suck one off.

Some people argue that stuffing things up you behind is being gay.
Some people argue that singing the love song from titanic is being gay...

 

[Kusanagi]

Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread

I dunno about the whole 'gay' thing, but I personally like futas because my mind processes it as 'hey, another way to pleasure the girl'.
It's all in how you look at in, IMO.
I don't think it's gay to look at futa, nor do I think it makes you gay. Liking a penis up the butt as well as not getting turned on by naked women is what would make a guy gay.

 

[ToxicShock]

Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread

What about a guy with no preference to sex, but purely focuses on sensation. That man would really not care if a woman was in front of him: not getting turned on, but the thought of anal stimulation via anything is exciting.

 

[Momiji]

Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread

What about a guy with no preference to sex, but purely focuses on sensation. That man would really not care if a woman was in front of him: not getting turned on, but the thought of anal stimulation via anything is exciting.

Tiger Woods?

 

[ToxicShock]

Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread

I am not aware of the topical humor.

 

[Pheonix Alugere]

Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread

What about a guy with no preference to sex, but purely focuses on sensation. That man would really not care if a woman was in front of him: not getting turned on, but the thought of anal stimulation via anything is exciting.

That's something along the lines of pansexual or polysexual, I think.

 

[ToxicShock]

Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread

Or asexual, but then don't know about the actual sexual stimulation.

 

[Pheonix Alugere]

Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread

Asexual would be not really caring about sex at all, even for the sensations.

 

[ToxicShock]

Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread

I had heard it only used socially, meaning preference.

 

[Newbie]

Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread

Asexuality has never really been studied, and is currently accepted to mean people with no sexual preference and no desire for sexual behavior. This does not mean that they don't have sex, it simply means they don't want sex for pleasure. Some asexuals are comfortable forming relationships with others of their kind and remaining virgins for most of their lives, but others have sex regularly simply on the grounds that their partner wants it.

Or I'm wrong, that's cool too.

 

[ToxicShock]

Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread

but others have sex regularly simply on the grounds that their partner wants it.

Which reminds me. I was kinda half-raped.

Don't really want to get into the details, but trust me when I say.. yeah kinda funny

 

[SirOni]

Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread

We have him here? That's... amusing actually. Unfortunate that he doesn't partake... or he partakes in threads I don't visit.

He's posted once or twice, but that was months ago. I dunno if he's logged in for ages.

 

[Pheonix Alugere]

Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread

Bacteria are asexual.

 

[fanta23]

Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread

Bacteria are asexual.

worms are asexual also to reproduce they meet another worm and touch and exchange DNA with each other with no sex involved. Also wouldn't a polysexual basically be a sex addict.

 

[ToxicShock]

Re: The Ranting/Debate Thread

Pan I heard as you pretty much find everything sexy. Bi is either sex but there can still be a preference?

Idk