Takumaru
Jungle Girl
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2016
- Messages
- 62
- Reputation score
- 34
Re: The Shape of the Earth is Actually in Debate...!
You are trying to insist that there will be so much friction, causing so much loss, but you did not seem to take into account the momentum generated, even if more effort was initially needed to move the locomotive. A giant train once in motion should continue to move, slowing down only against the various combinations of resistance from air/rail-friction/etc., but by the way, train-systems do in fact, currently already exist in certain parts of the world that run on their own energy systems (not reliant upon any kind of nuclear power-plant or national grid-system). I think they can be found in Japan and Germany. Principles are based on electro-magnetics (whether you refuse to refer to it as a "free energy" source is something I only regard as a matter of differences in interpretations of semantics).
The second video is questionable due to its quality looking to be likely from blue/green-screen. Just in case you are not familiar with blue/green-screen editing I point you to some examples here...
A computer that dangles down from a rope, into a lava-pit, even if suspended above the lava itself, will malfunction and be rendered inoperable if left there for an entire day (I know this because I have built/repaired/used computers for well over a decade). Additionally, anybody who's been inside of a car on a sunny day, with the windows down, has felt the "greenhouse-effect" heating up the inside. Exactly how does the ISS not become over-heated indoors if it is orbiting in 1500°C+ temperatures ? They cannot just open their windows like you would in a car lest all the oxygen escape and there being no more oxygen to breathe.
Besides that, I must assume that most people in this thread who have given me flack for this topic must believe and insist that the sun is 93 million miles away (93.3 million to be more specific from what I remember in astronomy classes back when I used to take all manners of university and college-courses), but if that were the case... then I really need an explanation for why footage from weather-balloons often seem to reveal a hot-spot upon the top of the clouds right beneath the sun, assuming this footage has not been done via CGI, that you can view for yourself here...
The busy work is what makes me look into these things because I know that there are better ways than for everyone in the same household to be working full-time-jobs that still get them nowhere. Productivity is practically non-existent in the United States now.First off, i apologize for the slow reply. Life is busy, I can't spend as much time around here as i would like, sometimes.
Most examples or just your example ?that most examples of bicycle generators are stationary. That's important, but i'll get back to it.
Friction is greatly reduced on rotational devices through the use of ball-bearings and lubricant. You do not need any math to personally see for yourself that combining lubricants with ball-bearings reduces friction. I have worked with plenty of gears before to be able to tell you this from experience. You should also know that a woman's tits being played with by thumbs rubbing upon them in little circular-motions for a dozen minutes whilst her ear-lobe is simultaneously being nibbled upon gets her wet and reduces the friction of putting even a giant erection into the hole between her legs... extend that rubbing to the clit for even more motions and generating energy and other interesting effects (the point here is that we as humans are a phenomenon of perpetual energy or at least a long-term-form of energy depending on how long the life-spans allow for [over-simplified example]).(Generators, friction, energy, etc.)
You are trying to insist that there will be so much friction, causing so much loss, but you did not seem to take into account the momentum generated, even if more effort was initially needed to move the locomotive. A giant train once in motion should continue to move, slowing down only against the various combinations of resistance from air/rail-friction/etc., but by the way, train-systems do in fact, currently already exist in certain parts of the world that run on their own energy systems (not reliant upon any kind of nuclear power-plant or national grid-system). I think they can be found in Japan and Germany. Principles are based on electro-magnetics (whether you refuse to refer to it as a "free energy" source is something I only regard as a matter of differences in interpretations of semantics).
I was not commenting on accuracy, but rather, what is to keep the weather-balloon from going any which way it pleases, followed by the retrieval of any recording devices. For cameras, I could probably use a more expensive camera, like a camcorder instead of a digital sports-camera, and yes, the camcorders I have/use, can record for a good 3-4 hours before batteries run out, but those are bigger batteries, cameras designed specifically for filming instead of digital-pictures, and the hell if I'm going to launch a several-hundred-dollar camera up into the sky unless I know I can retrieve it safely and consistently (from the videos that I have seen of people launching them up they took HELICOPTERS and tracking devices with them to find their equipment).(Weather-Balloons & Cameras)
I fail to see the purpose of showing a man who briefly sticks his foot onto a hot substance. The titles of the videos are also misleading. A man walking on lava would be one thing but this man only briefly put his foot onto hot surfaces (with foot-protection).And finally, the heat issue. 1500 Celsius is a lot, especially for electrical equipment, i agree. In response, I point you to youtube...
The second video is questionable due to its quality looking to be likely from blue/green-screen. Just in case you are not familiar with blue/green-screen editing I point you to some examples here...
You must be registered to see the links
A computer that dangles down from a rope, into a lava-pit, even if suspended above the lava itself, will malfunction and be rendered inoperable if left there for an entire day (I know this because I have built/repaired/used computers for well over a decade). Additionally, anybody who's been inside of a car on a sunny day, with the windows down, has felt the "greenhouse-effect" heating up the inside. Exactly how does the ISS not become over-heated indoors if it is orbiting in 1500°C+ temperatures ? They cannot just open their windows like you would in a car lest all the oxygen escape and there being no more oxygen to breathe.
Besides that, I must assume that most people in this thread who have given me flack for this topic must believe and insist that the sun is 93 million miles away (93.3 million to be more specific from what I remember in astronomy classes back when I used to take all manners of university and college-courses), but if that were the case... then I really need an explanation for why footage from weather-balloons often seem to reveal a hot-spot upon the top of the clouds right beneath the sun, assuming this footage has not been done via CGI, that you can view for yourself here...
You must be registered to see the links