Re: Feminism!
Speaking as a guy who was raised by a single mother and had a single, female sibling (I'm not really a paragon of masculinity obviously), I have learned that women and men are different. Very different in some ways, almost the same in others. To use an analogy, you have apples and oranges. The oranges are lobbying nature to make them more like apples, which nature does by making them both edable. Thus, apples and oranges are equal in that they're both edible, but they're still different and fufill that role differently. Now also keep in mind that each apple is different from eachother and each orange is different from eachother. Is either fruit more privilaged than the other? I say no. Is either better than the other? I say, each has different strengths, oranges are tangy and sweet, a taste combination that appeals to me, but need to be peeled to be properly enjoyed (tangent: that's my personal preferance, I have a friend who eats oranges like apples, rind and all.) while apples are crunchy and also sweet, which is another combination I like, but not as much as oranges, however apples don't need to be peeled for me to enjoy, so I'll generally take them over oranges (cause I'm a lazy ass), but I still enjoy oranges as a nice treat.
So to stop rambling about my fruit preferances and bring it into context, I believe both men and women are inequal, and can never be equal, but that neither is in any way "Better" than the other. Each has their strengths and weaknesses, and there are always exceptions. To the topic at hand, I believe that Feminism, along with just about all social constructs such as politics or religion, is a concept that should never have been made, and just makes a mess of things. This doesn't meen I'm anti-feminist, on the contrary, I would welcome a world with a majority of females (and actually, it would make more biological sense when I think about it... a few number of males can impregnate a large number of females, so from an evolutionary standpoint, there should be more females than males in a species... but I'm getting off topic). This also meens I'm not an anarchist or athiest. I just don't really care about these things. I don't think we really need them, but they seem to be rather entrenched in their current posisitions.
Which brings me to the women in workplaces angle. I wish I had a time machine so I could travel two or three generations into the future and see what the workplaces are like there. As the large majority (I think, I could be wrong) of upper management personel in those nameless large corporations that everyone talks about are 50+ year old males, and 50 years ago, there was a different social belief than now, these old guys are still stuck in their beliefs and resistant to change, just like everything (Thank you Newton). However, nobody lives forever, eventually these fartbags will be replaced with a new generation who grew up with different social rules so that, gradually, we'll see things change, maybe not in one generation, maybe not in two generations, but in a few, I believe there will be change. A lot of consolation that does the me-me-me, now-now-now yuppies complaining. I don't believe things can change so drastically in the course of a few years or even decades. If you consider that, 1000 years ago (give or take a few centuries, I'm not a history major), women were essentially slaves and that was the social norm, now they've got social status far higher. Maybe in another 1000 years it'll be the men who are subjugated, but really, does it matter now? Not really.
To make a long post short, everyone is different, shut up and deal with it. Things arn't going to change overnight, shut up and deal with it.
(Also, I'm abstaining from voting on this topic because... hmmm... because I just don't want to. Nya!)
(EDIT: Actually, because rereading the choices, I don't actually agree with any of them. So there.)