- Joined
- Jan 1, 2009
- Messages
- 19,403
- Reputation score
- 442
Re: Hoap Sues Freeko
I don't even recall him pissing 'you' off.
Freeko gets around.
I don't even recall him pissing 'you' off.
Freeko gets around.
Hoap Sues Freeko
- Thread starter Hopeyouguess62
- Start date
- Status
HentaiWriter
Tentacle God
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2014
- Messages
- 751
- Reputation score
- 366
Re: Hoap Sues Freeko
the mods/admins have had to close no less than four topics specifically due to him trash-talking me, the people i work with, and the games i work on because he believes we're all some master scammers using bernie madoff tactics, his words, not mine lol, and then me defending myself pretty much derails the topic etc.
he also nonstop trash talks patreon, anyone who uses it, anyone who makes stuff using it, etc. claiming it will "be the downfall of humanity"
how he's not banned already is a mindfuck to me, any other forum he would be IP banned for his behavior on the h-games board
you don't visit the h-games board much i take it
the mods/admins have had to close no less than four topics specifically due to him trash-talking me, the people i work with, and the games i work on because he believes we're all some master scammers using bernie madoff tactics, his words, not mine lol, and then me defending myself pretty much derails the topic etc.
he also nonstop trash talks patreon, anyone who uses it, anyone who makes stuff using it, etc. claiming it will "be the downfall of humanity"
how he's not banned already is a mindfuck to me, any other forum he would be IP banned for his behavior on the h-games board
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2009
- Messages
- 19,403
- Reputation score
- 442
Re: Hoap Sues Freeko
I'm still waiting for the ONE person who will always come to defend even the worst kind of human being.
I'm still waiting for the ONE person who will always come to defend even the worst kind of human being.
I don't really read all of the goings on. I generally just look at new threads that pop up to see if the game is any good. If the gameplay is ass then I look to see where I can just get the porn without having to suffer through the 'chore' of gameplay just to get what I want.you don't visit the h-games board much i take it
fagballs
Mystic Girl
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2014
- Messages
- 202
- Reputation score
- 47
Re: Hoap Sues Freeko
Can I make a vote to permaban you for useless double posting?
Congratulations, 9 people of a board he rarely visits want him gone. If you want to look less like a retard, you might want to post this in a place where he's actually active.
cross_grave
Lurker
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,211
- Reputation score
- 65
Re: Hoap Sues Freeko
Except this is the section designed specifically for such matters, so that they don't pop up elsewhere and can be kept track of easily?
Except this is the section designed specifically for such matters, so that they don't pop up elsewhere and can be kept track of easily?
Your wish has been granted, I think?
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2008
- Messages
- 5,062
- Reputation score
- 139
XSI
Lurker
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 2,521
- Reputation score
- 423
Re: Hoap Sues Freeko
I'd say a ban isn't really a great idea, sets a bad precedent and all that
Maybe a good idea to tell him to make a new thread for a topic when it gets to derailing a different thread though, or just have administrative staff step in to end a discussion/move it if things get out of hand
I'd say a ban isn't really a great idea, sets a bad precedent and all that
Maybe a good idea to tell him to make a new thread for a topic when it gets to derailing a different thread though, or just have administrative staff step in to end a discussion/move it if things get out of hand
cross_grave
Lurker
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,211
- Reputation score
- 65
Re: Hoap Sues Freeko
Apparently they've been forced to close threads already.
Apparently they've been forced to close threads already.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2009
- Messages
- 19,403
- Reputation score
- 442
Re: Hoap Sues Freeko
Speaking of, I have no idea why they're here, or what kind of point they're trying to make considering this thread didn't require nor want freeko's presence at all ironically, considering the name. I thought they were an alt of freeko's, but I've reason to believe that's not true.
They're a lot alike though, in that neither of them want to make friends here. Just annoy people (especially if you look at his User Page, but don't do it if you have medical issues looking at bright colors. You'll have to trust me that the guy is acting with the full desire to be a scumbag).
I'm not getting the stalwart and passionate defender I wanted, like someone defending OJ, but I am starting to realize what Tass said. I need to start taking names for later should we decide to purge.
No, it hasn't. He's not defending Freeko, just attacking hope.
Speaking of, I have no idea why they're here, or what kind of point they're trying to make considering this thread didn't require nor want freeko's presence at all ironically, considering the name. I thought they were an alt of freeko's, but I've reason to believe that's not true.
They're a lot alike though, in that neither of them want to make friends here. Just annoy people (especially if you look at his User Page, but don't do it if you have medical issues looking at bright colors. You'll have to trust me that the guy is acting with the full desire to be a scumbag).
I'm not getting the stalwart and passionate defender I wanted, like someone defending OJ, but I am starting to realize what Tass said. I need to start taking names for later should we decide to purge.
OP
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 2,433
- Reputation score
- 268
- Thread Starter
- #30
Re: Hoap Sues Freeko
Well, thus far we've got four votes against the ban and twelve votes for the ban. I'm not sure exactly who voted "aye" (I was the first), but I've got a pretty good idea of who voted "nay" so far.
Tassadar voted nay on principle, as I understand it, because he was concerned that we were working to ban someone on the sole purpose of his red rep bar. I agree with the principle, but the administration wouldn't even consider banning someone on that basis alone. Freeko's got a long record of being an abrasive asshole.
Freeko and fagballs voted nay in Freeko's defense. I'd offer reasons but they don't exactly seem like reasonable types (except in their own imaginations, I'm sure).
XSI voted nay on principle as well, suggesting that this was a dangerous precedent. Again, I agree with him in principle. Banning is a decision that should ultimately fall to the administration.
I can respect the points made by Tass and XSI. Nevertheless, I think freeko's trolled enough people, derailed enough conversations, attacked enough members (many of whom are content providers), and been enough of a dick in general to easily warrant the ban, and I still feel that the administration should strongly consider kicking the bum out, for good.
Well, thus far we've got four votes against the ban and twelve votes for the ban. I'm not sure exactly who voted "aye" (I was the first), but I've got a pretty good idea of who voted "nay" so far.
Tassadar voted nay on principle, as I understand it, because he was concerned that we were working to ban someone on the sole purpose of his red rep bar. I agree with the principle, but the administration wouldn't even consider banning someone on that basis alone. Freeko's got a long record of being an abrasive asshole.
Freeko and fagballs voted nay in Freeko's defense. I'd offer reasons but they don't exactly seem like reasonable types (except in their own imaginations, I'm sure).
XSI voted nay on principle as well, suggesting that this was a dangerous precedent. Again, I agree with him in principle. Banning is a decision that should ultimately fall to the administration.
I can respect the points made by Tass and XSI. Nevertheless, I think freeko's trolled enough people, derailed enough conversations, attacked enough members (many of whom are content providers), and been enough of a dick in general to easily warrant the ban, and I still feel that the administration should strongly consider kicking the bum out, for good.
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 4,909
- Reputation score
- 1,795
Re: Hoap Sues Freeko
I always thought this place was for joke cases and in-jokes.
I always thought this place was for joke cases and in-jokes.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2009
- Messages
- 19,403
- Reputation score
- 442
Re: Hoap Sues Freeko
It is now. You're the punchline.
WUBBA DUBBA ZUB ZUB
It is now. You're the punchline.
WUBBA DUBBA ZUB ZUB
Aurani
Unknown Squid's Husband
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2010
- Messages
- 492
- Reputation score
- 103
Re: Hoap Sues Freeko
Honestly though, ya'll being adorable bringing attention to the troll, which is exactly what they want?
Personally I could not care less as I have not run into him ever since he got banned from the shoutbox ages ago.
If he has actually broken forum rules, ban him. Last I checked trolling was never a bannable offense around here given our resident trolls of old that no longer come here.
Freeko din dun nuthin wrong.
Honestly though, ya'll being adorable bringing attention to the troll, which is exactly what they want?
Personally I could not care less as I have not run into him ever since he got banned from the shoutbox ages ago.
If he has actually broken forum rules, ban him. Last I checked trolling was never a bannable offense around here given our resident trolls of old that no longer come here.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2009
- Messages
- 19,403
- Reputation score
- 442
Re: Hoap Sues Freeko
Our resident trolls of old were actually funny and had a sense of humor.
Sure, obe asked Dark to show him his titties following a case of sexual harassment in the forum. Totally not appropriate. But it was funny.
Our resident trolls of old were actually funny and had a sense of humor.
Sure, obe asked Dark to show him his titties following a case of sexual harassment in the forum. Totally not appropriate. But it was funny.
dragoon93041
Tentacle God
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2011
- Messages
- 1,897
- Reputation score
- 3,182
Re: Hoap Sues Freeko
The thing is, we shouldn't be feeding the trolls (yes, I am aware of the hypocrisy of writing this post). This whole thread is one great buffet for freeko's ego. And if we ban him, what's to stop him from creating another account?
...also this is not the place for such things. We need someone to move this to Somewhere Else.
The thing is, we shouldn't be feeding the trolls (yes, I am aware of the hypocrisy of writing this post). This whole thread is one great buffet for freeko's ego. And if we ban him, what's to stop him from creating another account?
...also this is not the place for such things. We need someone to move this to Somewhere Else.
cross_grave
Lurker
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,211
- Reputation score
- 65
Re: Hoap Sues Freeko
Sometimes, things still need to be said and discussed, even if it might feed someone's ego. And just because a punishment might be circumvented there's no reason not to use it. Letting things lie because they aren't perfect won't solve anything.
Sometimes, things still need to be said and discussed, even if it might feed someone's ego. And just because a punishment might be circumvented there's no reason not to use it. Letting things lie because they aren't perfect won't solve anything.
freeko
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2010
- Messages
- 1,892
- Reputation score
- 160
Re: Hoap Sues Freeko
You do realize that I did not start this thread?
Nor have I ever said anything bad toward hope aside from basically taking his preconceived notions and dumping them on his own head. So this is clearly a joke in bad taste by hope that has been little more than to fuel his own one sided grudge against me.
The basis of his reasoning basically revolves around him thinking negatively about me. He makes claims, but has no way to substantiate them. I could say that it is hope that should be punished for making such an obvious attack upon me for little reason other than he feels like it. So according to hope, just start banning off everyone he doesnt get along with I guess right? See here is the thing, hope is using the threat of force (banning me) to obtain a result.
Were this an actual court case, it would already have been thrown out as I would expose the bias and simple lack of real evidence. I would even probably go so far as to look at remedies for prosecutorial misconduct as well.
You do realize that I did not start this thread?
Nor have I ever said anything bad toward hope aside from basically taking his preconceived notions and dumping them on his own head. So this is clearly a joke in bad taste by hope that has been little more than to fuel his own one sided grudge against me.
The basis of his reasoning basically revolves around him thinking negatively about me. He makes claims, but has no way to substantiate them. I could say that it is hope that should be punished for making such an obvious attack upon me for little reason other than he feels like it. So according to hope, just start banning off everyone he doesnt get along with I guess right? See here is the thing, hope is using the threat of force (banning me) to obtain a result.
Were this an actual court case, it would already have been thrown out as I would expose the bias and simple lack of real evidence. I would even probably go so far as to look at remedies for prosecutorial misconduct as well.
fagballs
Mystic Girl
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2014
- Messages
- 202
- Reputation score
- 47
Re: Hoap Sues Freeko
-This belongs on the Staff forum
-You make a thread to spite someone and look for sensation instead of just PMing an admin and raising the issue
-You can't even properly grasp forum culture, yet you think you get to decide who gets banned and who doesn't. Registered in 2008 and still making double posts like some guy who just flew in from Leddit or 4chins. Really?
-You post this in a section where there's just indifferent people who never dealt with him and upset people who get triggered by reading his name and come here to vote YES.
No, I don't like Freeko and his Patreon crusade, but I sure as hell don't like the thing you're trying to do here either. You can give me all the negative rep you want, that doesn't make you any less of an idiot.
No, I voted no because
-This belongs on the Staff forum
-You make a thread to spite someone and look for sensation instead of just PMing an admin and raising the issue
-You can't even properly grasp forum culture, yet you think you get to decide who gets banned and who doesn't. Registered in 2008 and still making double posts like some guy who just flew in from Leddit or 4chins. Really?
-You post this in a section where there's just indifferent people who never dealt with him and upset people who get triggered by reading his name and come here to vote YES.
No, I don't like Freeko and his Patreon crusade, but I sure as hell don't like the thing you're trying to do here either. You can give me all the negative rep you want, that doesn't make you any less of an idiot.
- Status