- Joined
- Nov 28, 2008
- Messages
- 6,983
- Reputation score
- 434
Re: Random movie talky stuff.
Black Hawk Down wasn't showing violence for people to go "fuck yeah" (even though people did, it's a side effect of seeing the bad guys explode) but to try and show an image of something close to modern warfare in all it's horror.
When Saving Private Ryan came out in 1998, I felt it really started a new trend in war films. No longer were they about waving the red white and blue. They were mostly now about trying to show how it was like. Up until Ridley Scott's film, there wasn't much out there about a more realistic modern war film.
Not to mention I don't think there's been any movies about the actions in Somalia. Rwanda gets more attention because machetes instead of starvation were used.
I wasn't sure how I felt about that movie, but it didn't seem at all like an action movie.If you try to spruce up an action film with plot, you get shit like "No country for old men" which is dumb and fuckall boring.
I feel like I'm the only person in the world that hated that movie.
I just hated how the main character was so nonchalantly killed off. We didn't see him die, we didn't even really see his corpse. He was killed off camera with about 15-30 minutes left of the movie. What the fuck?
Speaking of Black Hawk Down, I have to watch that again, since I picked up the extended cut. I really enjoyed that movie, but while it was a big huge explosion fest, I wouldn't call it an action movie. I generally separate war films from action movies.what about black hawk down?
20 minutes plot and setup
the rest of it is an action scene.
Black Hawk Down wasn't showing violence for people to go "fuck yeah" (even though people did, it's a side effect of seeing the bad guys explode) but to try and show an image of something close to modern warfare in all it's horror.
When Saving Private Ryan came out in 1998, I felt it really started a new trend in war films. No longer were they about waving the red white and blue. They were mostly now about trying to show how it was like. Up until Ridley Scott's film, there wasn't much out there about a more realistic modern war film.
Not to mention I don't think there's been any movies about the actions in Somalia. Rwanda gets more attention because machetes instead of starvation were used.
Last edited by a moderator: